Acid-dissolution of antigorite, chrysotile and lizardite for ex situ carbon capture and storage by mineralisation

Serpentine minerals serve as a Mg donor in carbon capture and storage by mineralisation (CCSM). The acid-treatment of nine comprehensively-examined serpentine polymorphs and polytypes, and the subsequent microanalysis of their post-test residues highlighted several aspects of great importance to the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lacinska, Alicja M., Styles, Michael T., Bateman, Keith, Wagner, Doris, Hall, Matthew R., Gowing, Charles, Brown, Paul D.
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/34594/
_version_ 1848794889824763904
author Lacinska, Alicja M.
Styles, Michael T.
Bateman, Keith
Wagner, Doris
Hall, Matthew R.
Gowing, Charles
Brown, Paul D.
author_facet Lacinska, Alicja M.
Styles, Michael T.
Bateman, Keith
Wagner, Doris
Hall, Matthew R.
Gowing, Charles
Brown, Paul D.
author_sort Lacinska, Alicja M.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Serpentine minerals serve as a Mg donor in carbon capture and storage by mineralisation (CCSM). The acid-treatment of nine comprehensively-examined serpentine polymorphs and polytypes, and the subsequent microanalysis of their post-test residues highlighted several aspects of great importance to the choice of the optimal feed material for CCSM. Compelling evidence for the non-uniformity of serpentine mineral performance was revealed, and the following order of increasing Mg extraction efficiency after three hours of acid-leaching was established: Al-bearing polygonal serpentine (<5%) ≤ Al-bearing lizardite 1T (≈5%) < antigorite (24-29%) < well-ordered lizardite 2H1 (≈65%) ≤ Al-poor lizardite 1T (≈68%) < chrysotile (≈70%) < poorly-ordered lizardite 2H1 (≈80%) < nanotubular chrysotile (≈85%). It was recognised that the Mg extraction efficiency of the minerals depended greatly on the intrinsic properties of crystal structure, chemistry and rock microtexture. On this basis, antigorite and Al-bearing well-ordered lizardite were rejected as potential feedstock material whereas any chrysotile, non-aluminous, widely spaced lizardite and/or disordered serpentine were recommended. The formation of peripheral siliceous layers, tens of microns thick, was not universal and depended greatly upon the intrinsic microtexture of the leached particles. This study provides the first comprehensive investigation of nine, carefully-selected serpentine minerals, covering most varieties and polytypes, under the same experimental conditions. We focused on material characterisation and the identification of the intrinsic properties of the minerals that affect particle’s reactivity. It can therefore serve as a generic basis for any acid-based CCSM pre-treatment.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:23:22Z
format Article
id nottingham-34594
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:23:22Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-345942024-08-15T15:20:31Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/34594/ Acid-dissolution of antigorite, chrysotile and lizardite for ex situ carbon capture and storage by mineralisation Lacinska, Alicja M. Styles, Michael T. Bateman, Keith Wagner, Doris Hall, Matthew R. Gowing, Charles Brown, Paul D. Serpentine minerals serve as a Mg donor in carbon capture and storage by mineralisation (CCSM). The acid-treatment of nine comprehensively-examined serpentine polymorphs and polytypes, and the subsequent microanalysis of their post-test residues highlighted several aspects of great importance to the choice of the optimal feed material for CCSM. Compelling evidence for the non-uniformity of serpentine mineral performance was revealed, and the following order of increasing Mg extraction efficiency after three hours of acid-leaching was established: Al-bearing polygonal serpentine (<5%) ≤ Al-bearing lizardite 1T (≈5%) < antigorite (24-29%) < well-ordered lizardite 2H1 (≈65%) ≤ Al-poor lizardite 1T (≈68%) < chrysotile (≈70%) < poorly-ordered lizardite 2H1 (≈80%) < nanotubular chrysotile (≈85%). It was recognised that the Mg extraction efficiency of the minerals depended greatly on the intrinsic properties of crystal structure, chemistry and rock microtexture. On this basis, antigorite and Al-bearing well-ordered lizardite were rejected as potential feedstock material whereas any chrysotile, non-aluminous, widely spaced lizardite and/or disordered serpentine were recommended. The formation of peripheral siliceous layers, tens of microns thick, was not universal and depended greatly upon the intrinsic microtexture of the leached particles. This study provides the first comprehensive investigation of nine, carefully-selected serpentine minerals, covering most varieties and polytypes, under the same experimental conditions. We focused on material characterisation and the identification of the intrinsic properties of the minerals that affect particle’s reactivity. It can therefore serve as a generic basis for any acid-based CCSM pre-treatment. Elsevier 2016-10-25 Article PeerReviewed Lacinska, Alicja M., Styles, Michael T., Bateman, Keith, Wagner, Doris, Hall, Matthew R., Gowing, Charles and Brown, Paul D. (2016) Acid-dissolution of antigorite, chrysotile and lizardite for ex situ carbon capture and storage by mineralisation. Chemical Geology, 437 . pp. 153-169. ISSN 0009-2541 Serpentine minerals; Mineral dissolution; CO2 sequestration http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009254116302546 doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.05.015 doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.05.015
spellingShingle Serpentine minerals; Mineral dissolution; CO2 sequestration
Lacinska, Alicja M.
Styles, Michael T.
Bateman, Keith
Wagner, Doris
Hall, Matthew R.
Gowing, Charles
Brown, Paul D.
Acid-dissolution of antigorite, chrysotile and lizardite for ex situ carbon capture and storage by mineralisation
title Acid-dissolution of antigorite, chrysotile and lizardite for ex situ carbon capture and storage by mineralisation
title_full Acid-dissolution of antigorite, chrysotile and lizardite for ex situ carbon capture and storage by mineralisation
title_fullStr Acid-dissolution of antigorite, chrysotile and lizardite for ex situ carbon capture and storage by mineralisation
title_full_unstemmed Acid-dissolution of antigorite, chrysotile and lizardite for ex situ carbon capture and storage by mineralisation
title_short Acid-dissolution of antigorite, chrysotile and lizardite for ex situ carbon capture and storage by mineralisation
title_sort acid-dissolution of antigorite, chrysotile and lizardite for ex situ carbon capture and storage by mineralisation
topic Serpentine minerals; Mineral dissolution; CO2 sequestration
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/34594/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/34594/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/34594/