On the affective salience of doctrines

This article builds on the work of George Lindbeck to examine the role of doctrines in the shaping of religious experience and emotion. Using a series of historical examples, it argues for the value of identifying a mode of theological argument that supports claims through attending to perceived aff...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zahl, Simeon
Format: Article
Published: Wiley 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/34575/
_version_ 1848794886150553600
author Zahl, Simeon
author_facet Zahl, Simeon
author_sort Zahl, Simeon
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description This article builds on the work of George Lindbeck to examine the role of doctrines in the shaping of religious experience and emotion. Using a series of historical examples, it argues for the value of identifying a mode of theological argument that supports claims through attending to perceived affective effects of particular doctrines. It then applies this approach to Philipp Melanchthon’s classic articulation of the forensic model of the doctrine justification by faith in light of contemporary critiques of the doctrine as a ‘legal fiction’ to show how such critiques fail when examined from the perspective of affective salience, and draws on recent work in cognitive science to demonstrate the psychological plausibility of Melanchthon’s description of the affective consequences of justification.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:23:19Z
format Article
id nottingham-34575
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:23:19Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Wiley
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-345752020-05-04T17:09:27Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/34575/ On the affective salience of doctrines Zahl, Simeon This article builds on the work of George Lindbeck to examine the role of doctrines in the shaping of religious experience and emotion. Using a series of historical examples, it argues for the value of identifying a mode of theological argument that supports claims through attending to perceived affective effects of particular doctrines. It then applies this approach to Philipp Melanchthon’s classic articulation of the forensic model of the doctrine justification by faith in light of contemporary critiques of the doctrine as a ‘legal fiction’ to show how such critiques fail when examined from the perspective of affective salience, and draws on recent work in cognitive science to demonstrate the psychological plausibility of Melanchthon’s description of the affective consequences of justification. Wiley 2015-07-01 Article PeerReviewed Zahl, Simeon (2015) On the affective salience of doctrines. Modern Theology, 31 (3). pp. 428-444. ISSN 1468-0025 Affectivity Melanchthon Lindbeck Milbank Doctrine Theology and Cognitive Science http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/moth.12166/abstract doi:10.1111/moth.12166 doi:10.1111/moth.12166
spellingShingle Affectivity
Melanchthon
Lindbeck
Milbank
Doctrine
Theology and Cognitive Science
Zahl, Simeon
On the affective salience of doctrines
title On the affective salience of doctrines
title_full On the affective salience of doctrines
title_fullStr On the affective salience of doctrines
title_full_unstemmed On the affective salience of doctrines
title_short On the affective salience of doctrines
title_sort on the affective salience of doctrines
topic Affectivity
Melanchthon
Lindbeck
Milbank
Doctrine
Theology and Cognitive Science
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/34575/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/34575/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/34575/