Differences in the determinants and targeting of anti-dumping: China and India compared
Despite both being developing countries, China and India have markedly contrasting patterns in their use and targeting of antidumping (AD) measures. We explore the factors driving AD use by these two countries, considering in turn macroeconomic, strategic and other determinants. We find more regular...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32992/ |
| _version_ | 1848794535119814656 |
|---|---|
| author | Meng, Ning Milner, Chris Song, Huasheng |
| author_facet | Meng, Ning Milner, Chris Song, Huasheng |
| author_sort | Meng, Ning |
| building | Nottingham Research Data Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Despite both being developing countries, China and India have markedly contrasting patterns in their use and targeting of antidumping (AD) measures. We explore the factors driving AD use by these two countries, considering in turn macroeconomic, strategic and other determinants. We find more regular or systematic features of AD use by China, while India displays a less systematic pattern of AD use. Economic growth, AD club effect and FTA participation are shown to constrain AD use by China. Compared to India, AD use by China is also more sensitive across industries. Furthermore, China targets developed countries more than developing countries, while India is less discriminating with respect to the country type it targets. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T19:17:44Z |
| format | Article |
| id | nottingham-32992 |
| institution | University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T19:17:44Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | nottingham-329922020-05-04T17:35:28Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32992/ Differences in the determinants and targeting of anti-dumping: China and India compared Meng, Ning Milner, Chris Song, Huasheng Despite both being developing countries, China and India have markedly contrasting patterns in their use and targeting of antidumping (AD) measures. We explore the factors driving AD use by these two countries, considering in turn macroeconomic, strategic and other determinants. We find more regular or systematic features of AD use by China, while India displays a less systematic pattern of AD use. Economic growth, AD club effect and FTA participation are shown to constrain AD use by China. Compared to India, AD use by China is also more sensitive across industries. Furthermore, China targets developed countries more than developing countries, while India is less discriminating with respect to the country type it targets. Taylor & Francis 2016-02-26 Article PeerReviewed Meng, Ning, Milner, Chris and Song, Huasheng (2016) Differences in the determinants and targeting of anti-dumping: China and India compared. Applied Economics . ISSN 1466-4283 China; India; antidumping http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00036846.2016.1150954 doi:10.1080/00036846.2016.1150954 doi:10.1080/00036846.2016.1150954 |
| spellingShingle | China; India; antidumping Meng, Ning Milner, Chris Song, Huasheng Differences in the determinants and targeting of anti-dumping: China and India compared |
| title | Differences in the determinants and targeting of anti-dumping: China and India compared |
| title_full | Differences in the determinants and targeting of anti-dumping: China and India compared |
| title_fullStr | Differences in the determinants and targeting of anti-dumping: China and India compared |
| title_full_unstemmed | Differences in the determinants and targeting of anti-dumping: China and India compared |
| title_short | Differences in the determinants and targeting of anti-dumping: China and India compared |
| title_sort | differences in the determinants and targeting of anti-dumping: china and india compared |
| topic | China; India; antidumping |
| url | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32992/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32992/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32992/ |