Can illness beliefs, from the common-sense model, prospectively predict adherence to self-management behaviours?: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Objective: To determine whether people’s beliefs about their illness, conceptualised by the common sense model (CSM), can prospectively predict adherence to self-management behaviours (including, attendance, medication, diet and exercise) in adults with acute and chronic physical illnesses. Desig...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Taylor and Francis
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32753/ |
| _version_ | 1848794482789580800 |
|---|---|
| author | Aujla, Navneet Walker, Marion Sprigg, Nikola Abrams, Keith Massey, Adam Vedhara, Kavita |
| author_facet | Aujla, Navneet Walker, Marion Sprigg, Nikola Abrams, Keith Massey, Adam Vedhara, Kavita |
| author_sort | Aujla, Navneet |
| building | Nottingham Research Data Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Objective: To determine whether people’s beliefs about their illness, conceptualised by the common sense model (CSM), can prospectively predict adherence to self-management behaviours (including, attendance, medication, diet and exercise) in adults with acute and chronic physical illnesses.
Design and Main Outcome Measures: Electronic databases were searched in September 2014, for papers specifying the use of the ‘CSM’ in relation to ‘self-management’, ‘rehabilitation’ and ‘adherence’ in the context of physical illness. Six hundred abstracts emerged. Data from 52 relevant studies were extracted. Twenty-one studies were meta-analysed, using correlation coefficients in random effects models. The remainder were descriptively synthesised.
Results: The effect sizes for individual illness belief domains and adherence to self-management behaviours ranged from .04 to .13, indicating very weak, predictive relationships. Further analysis revealed that predictive relationships did not differ by the: type of self-management behaviour; acute or chronic illness; or duration of follow-up.
Conclusion: Individual illness belief domains, outlined by the CSM, did not predict adherence to self-management behaviours in adults with physical illnesses. Prospective relationships, controlling for past behaviour, also did not emerge. Other factors, including patients’ treatment beliefs and inter-relationships between individual illness beliefs domains, may have influenced potential associations with adherence to self-management behaviours. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T19:16:54Z |
| format | Article |
| id | nottingham-32753 |
| institution | University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T19:16:54Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | Taylor and Francis |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | nottingham-327532020-05-04T17:40:00Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32753/ Can illness beliefs, from the common-sense model, prospectively predict adherence to self-management behaviours?: a systematic review and meta-analysis Aujla, Navneet Walker, Marion Sprigg, Nikola Abrams, Keith Massey, Adam Vedhara, Kavita Objective: To determine whether people’s beliefs about their illness, conceptualised by the common sense model (CSM), can prospectively predict adherence to self-management behaviours (including, attendance, medication, diet and exercise) in adults with acute and chronic physical illnesses. Design and Main Outcome Measures: Electronic databases were searched in September 2014, for papers specifying the use of the ‘CSM’ in relation to ‘self-management’, ‘rehabilitation’ and ‘adherence’ in the context of physical illness. Six hundred abstracts emerged. Data from 52 relevant studies were extracted. Twenty-one studies were meta-analysed, using correlation coefficients in random effects models. The remainder were descriptively synthesised. Results: The effect sizes for individual illness belief domains and adherence to self-management behaviours ranged from .04 to .13, indicating very weak, predictive relationships. Further analysis revealed that predictive relationships did not differ by the: type of self-management behaviour; acute or chronic illness; or duration of follow-up. Conclusion: Individual illness belief domains, outlined by the CSM, did not predict adherence to self-management behaviours in adults with physical illnesses. Prospective relationships, controlling for past behaviour, also did not emerge. Other factors, including patients’ treatment beliefs and inter-relationships between individual illness beliefs domains, may have influenced potential associations with adherence to self-management behaviours. Taylor and Francis 2016-03-28 Article PeerReviewed Aujla, Navneet, Walker, Marion, Sprigg, Nikola, Abrams, Keith, Massey, Adam and Vedhara, Kavita (2016) Can illness beliefs, from the common-sense model, prospectively predict adherence to self-management behaviours?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychology & Health, 2016 . ISSN 1476-8321 illness beliefs common sense model self-regulation theory self-management adherence systematic review http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08870446.2016.1153640 doi:10.1080/08870446.2016.1153640 doi:10.1080/08870446.2016.1153640 |
| spellingShingle | illness beliefs common sense model self-regulation theory self-management adherence systematic review Aujla, Navneet Walker, Marion Sprigg, Nikola Abrams, Keith Massey, Adam Vedhara, Kavita Can illness beliefs, from the common-sense model, prospectively predict adherence to self-management behaviours?: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title | Can illness beliefs, from the common-sense model, prospectively predict adherence to self-management behaviours?: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_full | Can illness beliefs, from the common-sense model, prospectively predict adherence to self-management behaviours?: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_fullStr | Can illness beliefs, from the common-sense model, prospectively predict adherence to self-management behaviours?: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Can illness beliefs, from the common-sense model, prospectively predict adherence to self-management behaviours?: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_short | Can illness beliefs, from the common-sense model, prospectively predict adherence to self-management behaviours?: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_sort | can illness beliefs, from the common-sense model, prospectively predict adherence to self-management behaviours?: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| topic | illness beliefs common sense model self-regulation theory self-management adherence systematic review |
| url | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32753/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32753/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32753/ |