Framing the agricultural use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in UK national newspapers and the farming press

Despite links to animal disease governance, food and biosecurity, rural studies has neglected consideration of how actors make sense of the use of antibiotics in animal agriculture and the implications for animal and human health. As antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a high-profile problem,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Morris, Carol, Helliwell, Richard, Raman, Sujatha
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32685/
_version_ 1848794467098689536
author Morris, Carol
Helliwell, Richard
Raman, Sujatha
author_facet Morris, Carol
Helliwell, Richard
Raman, Sujatha
author_sort Morris, Carol
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Despite links to animal disease governance, food and biosecurity, rural studies has neglected consideration of how actors make sense of the use of antibiotics in animal agriculture and the implications for animal and human health. As antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a high-profile problem, the contribution of animal antibiotics is frequently mentioned in scientific and policy documents but how different agricultural actors interpret its significance is less clear. This paper offers the first social scientific investigation of contestation and consensus surrounding the use of antibiotics in agriculture and their implications for AMR as mediated through mainstream news-media and farming print media in the UK. Frame analysis of four national newspapers and one farming paper reveals three distinct frames. A ‘system failure’ frame is the most frequently occurring and positions intensive livestock production systems as a key contributor to AMR-related crises in human health. A ‘maintaining the status quo’ frame argues that there is no evidence linking antibiotics in farming to AMR in humans and stresses the necessity of (some) antibiotic use for animal health. A third frame – which is only present in the farming media – highlights a need for voluntary, industry-led action on animal antibiotic use in terms of farmer self-interest. Common to all frames is that the relationship between agricultural use of antibiotics and problems posed by AMR is mostly discussed in terms of the implications for human health as opposed to both human and animal health.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:16:39Z
format Article
id nottingham-32685
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:16:39Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-326852020-05-04T20:02:24Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32685/ Framing the agricultural use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in UK national newspapers and the farming press Morris, Carol Helliwell, Richard Raman, Sujatha Despite links to animal disease governance, food and biosecurity, rural studies has neglected consideration of how actors make sense of the use of antibiotics in animal agriculture and the implications for animal and human health. As antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a high-profile problem, the contribution of animal antibiotics is frequently mentioned in scientific and policy documents but how different agricultural actors interpret its significance is less clear. This paper offers the first social scientific investigation of contestation and consensus surrounding the use of antibiotics in agriculture and their implications for AMR as mediated through mainstream news-media and farming print media in the UK. Frame analysis of four national newspapers and one farming paper reveals three distinct frames. A ‘system failure’ frame is the most frequently occurring and positions intensive livestock production systems as a key contributor to AMR-related crises in human health. A ‘maintaining the status quo’ frame argues that there is no evidence linking antibiotics in farming to AMR in humans and stresses the necessity of (some) antibiotic use for animal health. A third frame – which is only present in the farming media – highlights a need for voluntary, industry-led action on animal antibiotic use in terms of farmer self-interest. Common to all frames is that the relationship between agricultural use of antibiotics and problems posed by AMR is mostly discussed in terms of the implications for human health as opposed to both human and animal health. Elsevier 2016-06 Article PeerReviewed Morris, Carol, Helliwell, Richard and Raman, Sujatha (2016) Framing the agricultural use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in UK national newspapers and the farming press. Journal of Rural Studies, 45 . pp. 43-53. ISSN 0743-0167 Antibiotics; Agriculture; Antimicrobial resistance; Frames; Animal health http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016716300353 doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.03.003 doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.03.003
spellingShingle Antibiotics; Agriculture; Antimicrobial resistance; Frames; Animal health
Morris, Carol
Helliwell, Richard
Raman, Sujatha
Framing the agricultural use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in UK national newspapers and the farming press
title Framing the agricultural use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in UK national newspapers and the farming press
title_full Framing the agricultural use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in UK national newspapers and the farming press
title_fullStr Framing the agricultural use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in UK national newspapers and the farming press
title_full_unstemmed Framing the agricultural use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in UK national newspapers and the farming press
title_short Framing the agricultural use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in UK national newspapers and the farming press
title_sort framing the agricultural use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in uk national newspapers and the farming press
topic Antibiotics; Agriculture; Antimicrobial resistance; Frames; Animal health
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32685/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32685/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32685/