Norm elicitation in within-subject designs: testing for order effects

We investigate norms of corruption using the norm-elicitation procedure introduced by Krupka and Weber (2013). We use a within-subject design whereby the norms are elicited from the same subjects who are observed making choices in a bribery game. We test whether the order in which the norm-elicitati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D’Adda, Giovanna, Drouvelis, Michalis, Nosenzo, Daniele
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32651/
_version_ 1848794458616758272
author D’Adda, Giovanna
Drouvelis, Michalis
Nosenzo, Daniele
author_facet D’Adda, Giovanna
Drouvelis, Michalis
Nosenzo, Daniele
author_sort D’Adda, Giovanna
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description We investigate norms of corruption using the norm-elicitation procedure introduced by Krupka and Weber (2013). We use a within-subject design whereby the norms are elicited from the same subjects who are observed making choices in a bribery game. We test whether the order in which the norm-elicitation task and the bribery game are conducted affects elicited norms and behavior. We find little evidence of order effects in our experiment. We discuss how these results compare with those reported in the existing literature.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:16:31Z
format Article
id nottingham-32651
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:16:31Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-326512020-05-04T17:48:22Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32651/ Norm elicitation in within-subject designs: testing for order effects D’Adda, Giovanna Drouvelis, Michalis Nosenzo, Daniele We investigate norms of corruption using the norm-elicitation procedure introduced by Krupka and Weber (2013). We use a within-subject design whereby the norms are elicited from the same subjects who are observed making choices in a bribery game. We test whether the order in which the norm-elicitation task and the bribery game are conducted affects elicited norms and behavior. We find little evidence of order effects in our experiment. We discuss how these results compare with those reported in the existing literature. Elsevier 2016-06-01 Article PeerReviewed D’Adda, Giovanna, Drouvelis, Michalis and Nosenzo, Daniele (2016) Norm elicitation in within-subject designs: testing for order effects. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 62 . pp. 1-7. ISSN 2214-8051 Social norms; Norm elicitation; Order effects; Within-subject design; Bribery game http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804316300015 doi:10.1016/j.socec.2016.02.003 doi:10.1016/j.socec.2016.02.003
spellingShingle Social norms; Norm elicitation; Order effects; Within-subject design; Bribery game
D’Adda, Giovanna
Drouvelis, Michalis
Nosenzo, Daniele
Norm elicitation in within-subject designs: testing for order effects
title Norm elicitation in within-subject designs: testing for order effects
title_full Norm elicitation in within-subject designs: testing for order effects
title_fullStr Norm elicitation in within-subject designs: testing for order effects
title_full_unstemmed Norm elicitation in within-subject designs: testing for order effects
title_short Norm elicitation in within-subject designs: testing for order effects
title_sort norm elicitation in within-subject designs: testing for order effects
topic Social norms; Norm elicitation; Order effects; Within-subject design; Bribery game
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32651/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32651/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32651/