Do subject specialists produce more useful feedback than non-specialists when observing mathematics lessons?

Schools, districts and inspectorates routinely use non-specialists to observe lessons for accountability and professional development purposes. However, there is little empirical research on how well non-specialists observe lessons. We describe two pilot studies in which education professionals made...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Evans, Sheila, Jones, Ian, Dawson, Clare
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Published: 2014
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32186/
_version_ 1848794352945463296
author Evans, Sheila
Jones, Ian
Dawson, Clare
author_facet Evans, Sheila
Jones, Ian
Dawson, Clare
author_sort Evans, Sheila
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Schools, districts and inspectorates routinely use non-specialists to observe lessons for accountability and professional development purposes. However, there is little empirical research on how well non-specialists observe lessons. We describe two pilot studies in which education professionals made judgements about mathematics lesson observation reports, written by both specialists and non-specialists. In terms of providing feedback to the observed teachers, the professionals considered the specialists’ reports to be significantly more useful than the non-specialists’ reports. Written advice about a teacher’s practice influenced these judgements. The paper considers theoretical and practical implications, as well as limitations of our findings.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:14:50Z
format Conference or Workshop Item
id nottingham-32186
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:14:50Z
publishDate 2014
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-321862020-05-04T20:13:54Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32186/ Do subject specialists produce more useful feedback than non-specialists when observing mathematics lessons? Evans, Sheila Jones, Ian Dawson, Clare Schools, districts and inspectorates routinely use non-specialists to observe lessons for accountability and professional development purposes. However, there is little empirical research on how well non-specialists observe lessons. We describe two pilot studies in which education professionals made judgements about mathematics lesson observation reports, written by both specialists and non-specialists. In terms of providing feedback to the observed teachers, the professionals considered the specialists’ reports to be significantly more useful than the non-specialists’ reports. Written advice about a teacher’s practice influenced these judgements. The paper considers theoretical and practical implications, as well as limitations of our findings. 2014-07 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed Evans, Sheila, Jones, Ian and Dawson, Clare (2014) Do subject specialists produce more useful feedback than non-specialists when observing mathematics lessons? In: 38th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education and the 36th Conference of the North American Chapter of the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 15 - 20 July 2014, Vancouver, Canada. http://www.pmena.org/pmenaproceedings/PMENA%2036%20PME%2038%202014%20Proceedings%20Vol%203.pdf
spellingShingle Evans, Sheila
Jones, Ian
Dawson, Clare
Do subject specialists produce more useful feedback than non-specialists when observing mathematics lessons?
title Do subject specialists produce more useful feedback than non-specialists when observing mathematics lessons?
title_full Do subject specialists produce more useful feedback than non-specialists when observing mathematics lessons?
title_fullStr Do subject specialists produce more useful feedback than non-specialists when observing mathematics lessons?
title_full_unstemmed Do subject specialists produce more useful feedback than non-specialists when observing mathematics lessons?
title_short Do subject specialists produce more useful feedback than non-specialists when observing mathematics lessons?
title_sort do subject specialists produce more useful feedback than non-specialists when observing mathematics lessons?
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32186/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32186/