Less-tight versus tight control of hypertension in pregnancy

BACKGROUND The effects of less-tight versus tight control of hypertension on pregnancy complications are unclear. METHODS We performed an open, international, multicenter trial involving women at 14 weeks 0 days to 33 weeks 6 days of gestation who had nonproteinuric preexisting or gestational hyp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Magee, Laura A., von Dadelszen, Peter, Rey, Evelyne, Ross, Susan, Asztalos, Elizabeth, Murphy, Kellie E., Menzies, Jennifer, Sanchez, Johanna, Singer, Joel, Gafni, Amiram, Gruslin, Andrée, Helewa, Michael, Hutton, Eileen, Lee, Shoo K., Lee, Terry, Logan, Alexander G., Ganzevoort, Wessel, Welch, Ross, Thornton, Jim, Moutquin, Jean-Marie
Format: Article
Published: Massachusetts Medical Society 2015
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31818/
_version_ 1848794277959696384
author Magee, Laura A.
von Dadelszen, Peter
Rey, Evelyne
Ross, Susan
Asztalos, Elizabeth
Murphy, Kellie E.
Menzies, Jennifer
Sanchez, Johanna
Singer, Joel
Gafni, Amiram
Gruslin, Andrée
Helewa, Michael
Hutton, Eileen
Lee, Shoo K.
Lee, Terry
Logan, Alexander G.
Ganzevoort, Wessel
Welch, Ross
Thornton, Jim
Moutquin, Jean-Marie
author_facet Magee, Laura A.
von Dadelszen, Peter
Rey, Evelyne
Ross, Susan
Asztalos, Elizabeth
Murphy, Kellie E.
Menzies, Jennifer
Sanchez, Johanna
Singer, Joel
Gafni, Amiram
Gruslin, Andrée
Helewa, Michael
Hutton, Eileen
Lee, Shoo K.
Lee, Terry
Logan, Alexander G.
Ganzevoort, Wessel
Welch, Ross
Thornton, Jim
Moutquin, Jean-Marie
author_sort Magee, Laura A.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description BACKGROUND The effects of less-tight versus tight control of hypertension on pregnancy complications are unclear. METHODS We performed an open, international, multicenter trial involving women at 14 weeks 0 days to 33 weeks 6 days of gestation who had nonproteinuric preexisting or gestational hypertension, office diastolic blood pressure of 90 to 105 mm Hg (or 85 to 105 mm Hg if the woman was taking antihypertensive medications), and a live fetus. Women were randomly assigned to less-tight control (target diastolic blood pressure, 100 mm Hg) or tight control (target diastolic blood pressure, 85 mm Hg). The composite primary outcome was pregnancy loss or high-level neonatal care for more than 48 hours during the first 28 postnatal days. The secondary outcome was serious maternal complications occurring up to 6 weeks post partum or until hospital discharge, whichever was later. RESULTS Included in the analysis were 987 women; 74.6% had preexisting hypertension. The primary-outcome rates were similar among 493 women assigned to less-tight control and 488 women assigned to tight control (31.4% and 30.7%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.35), as were the rates of serious maternal complications (3.7% and 2.0%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 1.74; 95% CI, 0.79 to 3.84), despite a mean diastolic blood pressure that was higher in the less-tight-control group by 4.6 mm Hg (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.4). Severe hypertension (≥160/110 mm Hg) developed in 40.6% of the women in the less-tight-control group and 27.5% of the women in the tight-control group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS We found no significant between-group differences in the risk of pregnancy loss, high-level neonatal care, or overall maternal complications, although less-tight control was associated with a significantly higher frequency of severe maternal hypertension. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; CHIPS Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN71416914; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01192412.)
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:13:39Z
format Article
id nottingham-31818
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:13:39Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Massachusetts Medical Society
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-318182024-08-15T15:16:24Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31818/ Less-tight versus tight control of hypertension in pregnancy Magee, Laura A. von Dadelszen, Peter Rey, Evelyne Ross, Susan Asztalos, Elizabeth Murphy, Kellie E. Menzies, Jennifer Sanchez, Johanna Singer, Joel Gafni, Amiram Gruslin, Andrée Helewa, Michael Hutton, Eileen Lee, Shoo K. Lee, Terry Logan, Alexander G. Ganzevoort, Wessel Welch, Ross Thornton, Jim Moutquin, Jean-Marie BACKGROUND The effects of less-tight versus tight control of hypertension on pregnancy complications are unclear. METHODS We performed an open, international, multicenter trial involving women at 14 weeks 0 days to 33 weeks 6 days of gestation who had nonproteinuric preexisting or gestational hypertension, office diastolic blood pressure of 90 to 105 mm Hg (or 85 to 105 mm Hg if the woman was taking antihypertensive medications), and a live fetus. Women were randomly assigned to less-tight control (target diastolic blood pressure, 100 mm Hg) or tight control (target diastolic blood pressure, 85 mm Hg). The composite primary outcome was pregnancy loss or high-level neonatal care for more than 48 hours during the first 28 postnatal days. The secondary outcome was serious maternal complications occurring up to 6 weeks post partum or until hospital discharge, whichever was later. RESULTS Included in the analysis were 987 women; 74.6% had preexisting hypertension. The primary-outcome rates were similar among 493 women assigned to less-tight control and 488 women assigned to tight control (31.4% and 30.7%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.35), as were the rates of serious maternal complications (3.7% and 2.0%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 1.74; 95% CI, 0.79 to 3.84), despite a mean diastolic blood pressure that was higher in the less-tight-control group by 4.6 mm Hg (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.4). Severe hypertension (≥160/110 mm Hg) developed in 40.6% of the women in the less-tight-control group and 27.5% of the women in the tight-control group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS We found no significant between-group differences in the risk of pregnancy loss, high-level neonatal care, or overall maternal complications, although less-tight control was associated with a significantly higher frequency of severe maternal hypertension. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; CHIPS Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN71416914; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01192412.) Massachusetts Medical Society 2015-01-29 Article PeerReviewed Magee, Laura A., von Dadelszen, Peter, Rey, Evelyne, Ross, Susan, Asztalos, Elizabeth, Murphy, Kellie E., Menzies, Jennifer, Sanchez, Johanna, Singer, Joel, Gafni, Amiram, Gruslin, Andrée, Helewa, Michael, Hutton, Eileen, Lee, Shoo K., Lee, Terry, Logan, Alexander G., Ganzevoort, Wessel, Welch, Ross, Thornton, Jim and Moutquin, Jean-Marie (2015) Less-tight versus tight control of hypertension in pregnancy. New England Journal of Medicine, 372 (5). pp. 407-417. ISSN 1533-4406 http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1404595 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1404595 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1404595
spellingShingle Magee, Laura A.
von Dadelszen, Peter
Rey, Evelyne
Ross, Susan
Asztalos, Elizabeth
Murphy, Kellie E.
Menzies, Jennifer
Sanchez, Johanna
Singer, Joel
Gafni, Amiram
Gruslin, Andrée
Helewa, Michael
Hutton, Eileen
Lee, Shoo K.
Lee, Terry
Logan, Alexander G.
Ganzevoort, Wessel
Welch, Ross
Thornton, Jim
Moutquin, Jean-Marie
Less-tight versus tight control of hypertension in pregnancy
title Less-tight versus tight control of hypertension in pregnancy
title_full Less-tight versus tight control of hypertension in pregnancy
title_fullStr Less-tight versus tight control of hypertension in pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Less-tight versus tight control of hypertension in pregnancy
title_short Less-tight versus tight control of hypertension in pregnancy
title_sort less-tight versus tight control of hypertension in pregnancy
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31818/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31818/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31818/