The future as a design problem

An often unacknowledged yet foundational problem for design is how ‘futures‘ are recruited for design practice. This problem saturates considerations of what could or should be designed. We distinguish two intertwined approaches to this: ‘pragmatic projection’, which tries to tie the future to the p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reeves, Stuart, Goulden, Murray, Dingwall, Robert
Format: Article
Published: MIT Press 2016
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31804/
_version_ 1848794275377053696
author Reeves, Stuart
Goulden, Murray
Dingwall, Robert
author_facet Reeves, Stuart
Goulden, Murray
Dingwall, Robert
author_sort Reeves, Stuart
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description An often unacknowledged yet foundational problem for design is how ‘futures‘ are recruited for design practice. This problem saturates considerations of what could or should be designed. We distinguish two intertwined approaches to this: ‘pragmatic projection’, which tries to tie the future to the past, and ‘grand vision’, which ties the present to the future. We examine ubiquitous computing as a case study of how pragmatic projection and grand vision are practically expressed to direct and structure design decisions. We assess their implications and conclude by arguing that the social legitimacy of design futures should be increasingly integral to their construction.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:13:36Z
format Article
id nottingham-31804
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:13:36Z
publishDate 2016
publisher MIT Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-318042020-05-04T17:48:52Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31804/ The future as a design problem Reeves, Stuart Goulden, Murray Dingwall, Robert An often unacknowledged yet foundational problem for design is how ‘futures‘ are recruited for design practice. This problem saturates considerations of what could or should be designed. We distinguish two intertwined approaches to this: ‘pragmatic projection’, which tries to tie the future to the past, and ‘grand vision’, which ties the present to the future. We examine ubiquitous computing as a case study of how pragmatic projection and grand vision are practically expressed to direct and structure design decisions. We assess their implications and conclude by arguing that the social legitimacy of design futures should be increasingly integral to their construction. MIT Press 2016-06-01 Article PeerReviewed Reeves, Stuart, Goulden, Murray and Dingwall, Robert (2016) The future as a design problem. Design Issues, 32 (3). pp. 6-17. ISSN 1531-4790 https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/10.1162/DESI_a_00395 doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00395 doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00395
spellingShingle Reeves, Stuart
Goulden, Murray
Dingwall, Robert
The future as a design problem
title The future as a design problem
title_full The future as a design problem
title_fullStr The future as a design problem
title_full_unstemmed The future as a design problem
title_short The future as a design problem
title_sort future as a design problem
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31804/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31804/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31804/