Provision of smoking cessation support in UK primary care: impact of the 2012 QOF revision

Background Before 2012, UK GPs were paid only to offer cessation advice to smokers and only to those with smoking-related disease, a minority of all smokers. From 2012, GPs are now paid to offer all smokers referral for behavioural support and medication to assist cessation at least once every 2 yea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Szatkowski, Lisa, Aveyard, Paul
Format: Article
Published: Royal College of General Practitioners 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31534/
_version_ 1848794221576716288
author Szatkowski, Lisa
Aveyard, Paul
author_facet Szatkowski, Lisa
Aveyard, Paul
author_sort Szatkowski, Lisa
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Background Before 2012, UK GPs were paid only to offer cessation advice to smokers and only to those with smoking-related disease, a minority of all smokers. From 2012, GPs are now paid to offer all smokers referral for behavioural support and medication to assist cessation at least once every 2 years. Aim To quantify the impact of this new recommendation and payment on indicators of smoking cessation activity. Design and setting Interrupted time series analysis of data from general practices in England contributing data to The Health Improvement Network (THIN). Method Data were extracted on monthly rates of recorded delivery of smoking cessation advice, referral to NHS Stop Smoking Services, and prescription of smoking cessation medications, among an average of 3.3 million patients aged >16 years registered each month in THIN. ARIMA models were used to quantify changes in rates of cessation activity after the 2012 Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) revision compared with beforehand. Results The proportion of patients each month with a record of advice to quit smoking increased by 19.6% (95% CI = 7.9 to 31.4) in the year after the introduction of payments compared with the 8 years beforehand; the recording of referral to Stop Smoking Services increased by 38.8% (95% CI = 15.2 to 62.4). There was no significant change in prescription of smoking cessation medication, −7.7% (95% CI = −21.6 to 6.2). Conclusion Paying GPs to intervene with all smokers and offer support rather than just advice to quit is associated with an increase in recording of advice and referring patients for behavioural support to stop smoking, but no change in prescribing pharmacotherapy for cessation.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:12:45Z
format Article
id nottingham-31534
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:12:45Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-315342020-04-29T15:17:49Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31534/ Provision of smoking cessation support in UK primary care: impact of the 2012 QOF revision Szatkowski, Lisa Aveyard, Paul Background Before 2012, UK GPs were paid only to offer cessation advice to smokers and only to those with smoking-related disease, a minority of all smokers. From 2012, GPs are now paid to offer all smokers referral for behavioural support and medication to assist cessation at least once every 2 years. Aim To quantify the impact of this new recommendation and payment on indicators of smoking cessation activity. Design and setting Interrupted time series analysis of data from general practices in England contributing data to The Health Improvement Network (THIN). Method Data were extracted on monthly rates of recorded delivery of smoking cessation advice, referral to NHS Stop Smoking Services, and prescription of smoking cessation medications, among an average of 3.3 million patients aged >16 years registered each month in THIN. ARIMA models were used to quantify changes in rates of cessation activity after the 2012 Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) revision compared with beforehand. Results The proportion of patients each month with a record of advice to quit smoking increased by 19.6% (95% CI = 7.9 to 31.4) in the year after the introduction of payments compared with the 8 years beforehand; the recording of referral to Stop Smoking Services increased by 38.8% (95% CI = 15.2 to 62.4). There was no significant change in prescription of smoking cessation medication, −7.7% (95% CI = −21.6 to 6.2). Conclusion Paying GPs to intervene with all smokers and offer support rather than just advice to quit is associated with an increase in recording of advice and referring patients for behavioural support to stop smoking, but no change in prescribing pharmacotherapy for cessation. Royal College of General Practitioners 2016-01-01 Article PeerReviewed Szatkowski, Lisa and Aveyard, Paul (2016) Provision of smoking cessation support in UK primary care: impact of the 2012 QOF revision. British Journal of General Practice, 66 (642). e10-e15. ISSN 1478-5242 financial incentive; interrupted time series analysis; prescribing patterns; primary care; smoking cessation; tobacco use http://bjgp.org/content/66/642/e10 doi:10.3399/bjgp15X688117 doi:10.3399/bjgp15X688117
spellingShingle financial incentive; interrupted time series analysis; prescribing patterns; primary care; smoking cessation; tobacco use
Szatkowski, Lisa
Aveyard, Paul
Provision of smoking cessation support in UK primary care: impact of the 2012 QOF revision
title Provision of smoking cessation support in UK primary care: impact of the 2012 QOF revision
title_full Provision of smoking cessation support in UK primary care: impact of the 2012 QOF revision
title_fullStr Provision of smoking cessation support in UK primary care: impact of the 2012 QOF revision
title_full_unstemmed Provision of smoking cessation support in UK primary care: impact of the 2012 QOF revision
title_short Provision of smoking cessation support in UK primary care: impact of the 2012 QOF revision
title_sort provision of smoking cessation support in uk primary care: impact of the 2012 qof revision
topic financial incentive; interrupted time series analysis; prescribing patterns; primary care; smoking cessation; tobacco use
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31534/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31534/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31534/