Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT?
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
| Online Access: | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31467/ |
| _version_ | 1848794209946959872 |
|---|---|
| author | Docherty, Graeme Lewis, Sarah McEwen, Andy Bauld, Linda Coleman, Tim |
| author_facet | Docherty, Graeme Lewis, Sarah McEwen, Andy Bauld, Linda Coleman, Tim |
| author_sort | Docherty, Graeme |
| building | Nottingham Research Data Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T19:12:34Z |
| format | Article |
| id | nottingham-31467 |
| institution | University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T19:12:34Z |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | nottingham-314672020-05-04T16:54:50Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31467/ Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT? Docherty, Graeme Lewis, Sarah McEwen, Andy Bauld, Linda Coleman, Tim BMJ Publishing Group 2014-11-01 Article PeerReviewed Docherty, Graeme, Lewis, Sarah, McEwen, Andy, Bauld, Linda and Coleman, Tim (2014) Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT? Tobacco Control, 23 (6). pp. 524-525. ISSN 1468-3318 http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/23/6/524 doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051107 doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051107 |
| spellingShingle | Docherty, Graeme Lewis, Sarah McEwen, Andy Bauld, Linda Coleman, Tim Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT? |
| title | Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT? |
| title_full | Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT? |
| title_fullStr | Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT? |
| title_short | Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT? |
| title_sort | does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering nrt to quitline callers in a rct? |
| url | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31467/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31467/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31467/ |