Comparisons of observed and modelled lake δ18O variability

With the substantial number of lake sediment δ18O records published in recent decades, a quantitative, process-based understanding of these systems can increase our understanding of past climate change. We test mass balance models of lake water δ18O variability against five years of monthly monitori...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jones, Matthew D., Cuthbert, M.O., Leng, Melanie J., McGowan, Suzanne, Mariethoz, G., Arrowsmith, Carol, Sloane, Hilary J., Humphrey, K.K., Cross, Iain
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31370/
_version_ 1848794185975463936
author Jones, Matthew D.
Cuthbert, M.O.
Leng, Melanie J.
McGowan, Suzanne
Mariethoz, G.
Arrowsmith, Carol
Sloane, Hilary J.
Humphrey, K.K.
Cross, Iain
author_facet Jones, Matthew D.
Cuthbert, M.O.
Leng, Melanie J.
McGowan, Suzanne
Mariethoz, G.
Arrowsmith, Carol
Sloane, Hilary J.
Humphrey, K.K.
Cross, Iain
author_sort Jones, Matthew D.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description With the substantial number of lake sediment δ18O records published in recent decades, a quantitative, process-based understanding of these systems can increase our understanding of past climate change. We test mass balance models of lake water δ18O variability against five years of monthly monitoring data from lakes with different hydrological characteristics, in the East-Midlands region of the UK, and the local isotope composition of precipitation. These mass balance models can explain up to 74% of the measured lake water isotope variability. We investigate the sensitivity of the model to differing calculations of evaporation amount, the amount of groundwater, and to different climatic variables. We show there is only a small range of values for groundwater exchange flux that can produce suitable lake water isotope compositions and that variations in evaporation and precipitation are both required to produce recorded isotope variability in lakes with substantial evaporative water losses. We then discuss the potential for this model to be used in a long-term, palaeo-scenario. This study demonstrates how long term monitoring of a lake system can lead to the development of robust models of lake water isotope compositions. Such systematics-based explanations allow us to move from conceptual, to more quantified reconstructions of past climates and environments.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:12:11Z
format Article
id nottingham-31370
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:12:11Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-313702020-05-04T17:24:47Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31370/ Comparisons of observed and modelled lake δ18O variability Jones, Matthew D. Cuthbert, M.O. Leng, Melanie J. McGowan, Suzanne Mariethoz, G. Arrowsmith, Carol Sloane, Hilary J. Humphrey, K.K. Cross, Iain With the substantial number of lake sediment δ18O records published in recent decades, a quantitative, process-based understanding of these systems can increase our understanding of past climate change. We test mass balance models of lake water δ18O variability against five years of monthly monitoring data from lakes with different hydrological characteristics, in the East-Midlands region of the UK, and the local isotope composition of precipitation. These mass balance models can explain up to 74% of the measured lake water isotope variability. We investigate the sensitivity of the model to differing calculations of evaporation amount, the amount of groundwater, and to different climatic variables. We show there is only a small range of values for groundwater exchange flux that can produce suitable lake water isotope compositions and that variations in evaporation and precipitation are both required to produce recorded isotope variability in lakes with substantial evaporative water losses. We then discuss the potential for this model to be used in a long-term, palaeo-scenario. This study demonstrates how long term monitoring of a lake system can lead to the development of robust models of lake water isotope compositions. Such systematics-based explanations allow us to move from conceptual, to more quantified reconstructions of past climates and environments. Elsevier 2016-01-01 Article PeerReviewed Jones, Matthew D., Cuthbert, M.O., Leng, Melanie J., McGowan, Suzanne, Mariethoz, G., Arrowsmith, Carol, Sloane, Hilary J., Humphrey, K.K. and Cross, Iain (2016) Comparisons of observed and modelled lake δ18O variability. Quaternary Science Reviews, 131 (B). pp. 329-340. ISSN 1873-457X oxygen isotopes lakes groundwater modelling http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379115301104 doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.09.012 doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.09.012
spellingShingle oxygen isotopes
lakes
groundwater
modelling
Jones, Matthew D.
Cuthbert, M.O.
Leng, Melanie J.
McGowan, Suzanne
Mariethoz, G.
Arrowsmith, Carol
Sloane, Hilary J.
Humphrey, K.K.
Cross, Iain
Comparisons of observed and modelled lake δ18O variability
title Comparisons of observed and modelled lake δ18O variability
title_full Comparisons of observed and modelled lake δ18O variability
title_fullStr Comparisons of observed and modelled lake δ18O variability
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons of observed and modelled lake δ18O variability
title_short Comparisons of observed and modelled lake δ18O variability
title_sort comparisons of observed and modelled lake δ18o variability
topic oxygen isotopes
lakes
groundwater
modelling
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31370/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31370/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31370/