One swallow doesn't make a summer: new evidence on anchoring effects

Some researchers have argued that anchoring in economic valuations casts doubt on the assumption of consistent and stable preferences. We present new evidence that explores the strength of certain anchoring results. We then present a theoretical framework that provides insights into why we should be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maniadis, Zacharias, Tufano, Fabio, List, John A.
Format: Article
Published: American Economic Association 2014
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31360/
_version_ 1848794184833564672
author Maniadis, Zacharias
Tufano, Fabio
List, John A.
author_facet Maniadis, Zacharias
Tufano, Fabio
List, John A.
author_sort Maniadis, Zacharias
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Some researchers have argued that anchoring in economic valuations casts doubt on the assumption of consistent and stable preferences. We present new evidence that explores the strength of certain anchoring results. We then present a theoretical framework that provides insights into why we should be cautious of initial empirical findings in general. The model importantly highlights that the rate of false positives depends not only on the observed significance level, but also on statistical power, research priors, and the number of scholars exploring the question. Importantly, a few independent replications dramatically increase the chances that the original finding is true.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:12:10Z
format Article
id nottingham-31360
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:12:10Z
publishDate 2014
publisher American Economic Association
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-313602020-05-04T20:15:46Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31360/ One swallow doesn't make a summer: new evidence on anchoring effects Maniadis, Zacharias Tufano, Fabio List, John A. Some researchers have argued that anchoring in economic valuations casts doubt on the assumption of consistent and stable preferences. We present new evidence that explores the strength of certain anchoring results. We then present a theoretical framework that provides insights into why we should be cautious of initial empirical findings in general. The model importantly highlights that the rate of false positives depends not only on the observed significance level, but also on statistical power, research priors, and the number of scholars exploring the question. Importantly, a few independent replications dramatically increase the chances that the original finding is true. American Economic Association 2014-01 Article PeerReviewed Maniadis, Zacharias, Tufano, Fabio and List, John A. (2014) One swallow doesn't make a summer: new evidence on anchoring effects. American Economic Review, 104 (1). pp. 277-290. ISSN 0002-8282 https://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/aer.104.1.277 doi:10.1257/aer.104.1.277 doi:10.1257/aer.104.1.277
spellingShingle Maniadis, Zacharias
Tufano, Fabio
List, John A.
One swallow doesn't make a summer: new evidence on anchoring effects
title One swallow doesn't make a summer: new evidence on anchoring effects
title_full One swallow doesn't make a summer: new evidence on anchoring effects
title_fullStr One swallow doesn't make a summer: new evidence on anchoring effects
title_full_unstemmed One swallow doesn't make a summer: new evidence on anchoring effects
title_short One swallow doesn't make a summer: new evidence on anchoring effects
title_sort one swallow doesn't make a summer: new evidence on anchoring effects
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31360/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31360/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31360/