The role of civil liability in ensuring police responsibility for failures to act after Michael and DSD

Police failures may contribute to a failure to prevent injury, or worse. The question of whether the police should be liable for such investigatory failures has exercised the higher courts frequently since the seminal case of Hill. The Supreme Court has recently revisited the question in the case of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hyde, Richard
Format: Article
Published: EJoCLI 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/30969/
_version_ 1848794101836677120
author Hyde, Richard
author_facet Hyde, Richard
author_sort Hyde, Richard
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Police failures may contribute to a failure to prevent injury, or worse. The question of whether the police should be liable for such investigatory failures has exercised the higher courts frequently since the seminal case of Hill. The Supreme Court has recently revisited the question in the case of Michael, holding that the police will not be liable for a failure to prevent injury unless there are special circumstances showing an assumption of responsibility. In parallel to the developments in negligence, claims have been brought under the Human Rights Act, with an argument that the failures by the police led to injury or death, breaching obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights. Such a claim was successful before the Court of Appeal in DSD.This article seeks to analyse these two parallel trends, and to consider whether civil liability after Michael and DSD provides an avenue for obtaining both compensation and accountability.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:10:51Z
format Article
id nottingham-30969
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:10:51Z
publishDate 2016
publisher EJoCLI
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-309692020-05-04T20:05:16Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/30969/ The role of civil liability in ensuring police responsibility for failures to act after Michael and DSD Hyde, Richard Police failures may contribute to a failure to prevent injury, or worse. The question of whether the police should be liable for such investigatory failures has exercised the higher courts frequently since the seminal case of Hill. The Supreme Court has recently revisited the question in the case of Michael, holding that the police will not be liable for a failure to prevent injury unless there are special circumstances showing an assumption of responsibility. In parallel to the developments in negligence, claims have been brought under the Human Rights Act, with an argument that the failures by the police led to injury or death, breaching obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights. Such a claim was successful before the Court of Appeal in DSD.This article seeks to analyse these two parallel trends, and to consider whether civil liability after Michael and DSD provides an avenue for obtaining both compensation and accountability. EJoCLI 2016 Article PeerReviewed Hyde, Richard (2016) The role of civil liability in ensuring police responsibility for failures to act after Michael and DSD. European Journal of Current Legal Issues, 22 (1). ISSN 2059-0881 Police Accountability; Tort; Human Rights; Damages http://webjcli.org/article/view/443
spellingShingle Police Accountability; Tort; Human Rights; Damages
Hyde, Richard
The role of civil liability in ensuring police responsibility for failures to act after Michael and DSD
title The role of civil liability in ensuring police responsibility for failures to act after Michael and DSD
title_full The role of civil liability in ensuring police responsibility for failures to act after Michael and DSD
title_fullStr The role of civil liability in ensuring police responsibility for failures to act after Michael and DSD
title_full_unstemmed The role of civil liability in ensuring police responsibility for failures to act after Michael and DSD
title_short The role of civil liability in ensuring police responsibility for failures to act after Michael and DSD
title_sort role of civil liability in ensuring police responsibility for failures to act after michael and dsd
topic Police Accountability; Tort; Human Rights; Damages
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/30969/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/30969/