Explaining moral knowledge

In this paper I assess the viability of a particularist explanation of moral knowledge. First, I consider two arguments by Sean McKeever and Michael Ridge that purport to show that a generalist, principle-based explanation of practical wisdom—understood as the ability to acquire moral knowledge in a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Leibowitz, Uri D.
Format: Article
Published: Brill 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/30942/
_version_ 1848794095599747072
author Leibowitz, Uri D.
author_facet Leibowitz, Uri D.
author_sort Leibowitz, Uri D.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description In this paper I assess the viability of a particularist explanation of moral knowledge. First, I consider two arguments by Sean McKeever and Michael Ridge that purport to show that a generalist, principle-based explanation of practical wisdom—understood as the ability to acquire moral knowledge in a wide range of situations—is superior to a particularist, non-principle-based account. I contend that both arguments are unsuccessful. Then, I propose a particularist-friendly explanation of knowledge of particular moral facts. I argue that when we are careful to keep separate the various explanatory tasks at hand we can see that a particularist-friendly explanation of the fact that (e.g.,) Jane knows that A is morally right might not be so difficult to come by. Moreover, I suggest that a particularist approach to explaining knowledge of particular moral facts may go some way towards discharging the challenge of moral scepticism.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:10:45Z
format Article
id nottingham-30942
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:10:45Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Brill
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-309422020-05-04T20:17:06Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/30942/ Explaining moral knowledge Leibowitz, Uri D. In this paper I assess the viability of a particularist explanation of moral knowledge. First, I consider two arguments by Sean McKeever and Michael Ridge that purport to show that a generalist, principle-based explanation of practical wisdom—understood as the ability to acquire moral knowledge in a wide range of situations—is superior to a particularist, non-principle-based account. I contend that both arguments are unsuccessful. Then, I propose a particularist-friendly explanation of knowledge of particular moral facts. I argue that when we are careful to keep separate the various explanatory tasks at hand we can see that a particularist-friendly explanation of the fact that (e.g.,) Jane knows that A is morally right might not be so difficult to come by. Moreover, I suggest that a particularist approach to explaining knowledge of particular moral facts may go some way towards discharging the challenge of moral scepticism. Brill 2014 Article PeerReviewed Leibowitz, Uri D. (2014) Explaining moral knowledge. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 11 (1). pp. 35-56. ISSN 1745-5243 particularism – generalism – principles – moral knowledge – moral epistemology http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/17455243-4681012 doi:10.1163/17455243-4681012 doi:10.1163/17455243-4681012
spellingShingle particularism – generalism – principles – moral knowledge – moral epistemology
Leibowitz, Uri D.
Explaining moral knowledge
title Explaining moral knowledge
title_full Explaining moral knowledge
title_fullStr Explaining moral knowledge
title_full_unstemmed Explaining moral knowledge
title_short Explaining moral knowledge
title_sort explaining moral knowledge
topic particularism – generalism – principles – moral knowledge – moral epistemology
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/30942/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/30942/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/30942/