Risky choice in the limelight

This paper examines how risk behavior in the limelight differs from that in anonymity. In two separate experiments we find that subjects are more risk averse in the limelight. However, risky choices are similarly path dependent in the different treatments. Under both limelight and anonymous laborato...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: van den Assem, Martijn J., Baltussen, Guido, van Dolder, Dennie
Format: Article
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/30841/
_version_ 1848794073562873856
author van den Assem, Martijn J.
Baltussen, Guido
van Dolder, Dennie
author_facet van den Assem, Martijn J.
Baltussen, Guido
van Dolder, Dennie
author_sort van den Assem, Martijn J.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description This paper examines how risk behavior in the limelight differs from that in anonymity. In two separate experiments we find that subjects are more risk averse in the limelight. However, risky choices are similarly path dependent in the different treatments. Under both limelight and anonymous laboratory conditions, a simple prospect theory model with a path-dependent reference point provides a better explanation for subjects’ behavior than a flexible specification of expected utility theory. Additionally, our findings suggest that ambiguity aversion depends on being in the limelight, that passive experience has little effect on risk taking, and that reference points are determined by imperfectly updated expectations.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:10:24Z
format Article
id nottingham-30841
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:10:24Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-308412020-05-04T20:12:12Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/30841/ Risky choice in the limelight van den Assem, Martijn J. Baltussen, Guido van Dolder, Dennie This paper examines how risk behavior in the limelight differs from that in anonymity. In two separate experiments we find that subjects are more risk averse in the limelight. However, risky choices are similarly path dependent in the different treatments. Under both limelight and anonymous laboratory conditions, a simple prospect theory model with a path-dependent reference point provides a better explanation for subjects’ behavior than a flexible specification of expected utility theory. Additionally, our findings suggest that ambiguity aversion depends on being in the limelight, that passive experience has little effect on risk taking, and that reference points are determined by imperfectly updated expectations. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press 2015 Article PeerReviewed van den Assem, Martijn J., Baltussen, Guido and van Dolder, Dennie (2015) Risky choice in the limelight. Review of Economics and Statistics . ISSN 1530-9142 (In Press) decision making under risk risky choice risk preferences risk aversion ambiguity aversion limelight accountability public scrutiny experience game show natural experiment laboratory experiment expected utility theory prospect theory http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/REST_a_00505 doi:10.1162/REST_a_00505 doi:10.1162/REST_a_00505
spellingShingle decision making under risk
risky choice
risk preferences
risk aversion
ambiguity aversion
limelight
accountability
public scrutiny
experience
game show
natural experiment
laboratory experiment
expected utility theory
prospect theory
van den Assem, Martijn J.
Baltussen, Guido
van Dolder, Dennie
Risky choice in the limelight
title Risky choice in the limelight
title_full Risky choice in the limelight
title_fullStr Risky choice in the limelight
title_full_unstemmed Risky choice in the limelight
title_short Risky choice in the limelight
title_sort risky choice in the limelight
topic decision making under risk
risky choice
risk preferences
risk aversion
ambiguity aversion
limelight
accountability
public scrutiny
experience
game show
natural experiment
laboratory experiment
expected utility theory
prospect theory
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/30841/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/30841/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/30841/