A qualitative process evaluation of electronic session-by-session outcome measurement in child and adolescent mental health services

Background Regular monitoring of patient progress is important to assess the clinical effectiveness of an intervention. Recently, initiatives within UK child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) have advocated the use of session-by-session monitoring to continually evaluate the patient’s o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hall, Charlotte L., Taylor, John, Moldavsky, Maria, Marriott, Michael, Pass, Sarah, Newell, Karen, Goodman, Robert, Sayal, Kapil, Hollis, Chris
Format: Article
Published: BioMed Central 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/30708/
_version_ 1848794041669386240
author Hall, Charlotte L.
Taylor, John
Moldavsky, Maria
Marriott, Michael
Pass, Sarah
Newell, Karen
Goodman, Robert
Sayal, Kapil
Hollis, Chris
author_facet Hall, Charlotte L.
Taylor, John
Moldavsky, Maria
Marriott, Michael
Pass, Sarah
Newell, Karen
Goodman, Robert
Sayal, Kapil
Hollis, Chris
author_sort Hall, Charlotte L.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Background Regular monitoring of patient progress is important to assess the clinical effectiveness of an intervention. Recently, initiatives within UK child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) have advocated the use of session-by-session monitoring to continually evaluate the patient’s outcome throughout the course of the intervention. However, the feasibility and acceptability of such regular monitoring is unknown. Method Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with clinicians (n = 10), administrative staff (n = 8) and families (n = 15) who participated in a feasibility study of an electronic session-by-session outcome monitoring tool, (SxS), which is based on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). This study took place in three CAMHS clinics in Nottinghamshire. The interview transcripts were thematically analysed. Results We found clinicians accepted the need to complete outcome measures, particularly valuing those completed by the patient. However, there were some difficulties with engaging clinicians in this practice and in the training offered. Generally, patients were supportive of completing SxS in the waiting room prior to the clinic session and assistance with the process from administrative staff was seen to be a key factor. Clinicians and families found the feedback reports created from SxS to be helpful for tracking progress, facilitating communication and engagement, and as a point of reflection. The use of technology was considered positively, although some technological difficulties hindered the completion of SxS. Clinicians and families appreciated the brevity of SxS, but some were concerned that a short questionnaire could not adequately encapsulate the complexity of the patient’s issues. Conclusions The findings show the need for appropriate infrastructure, mandatory training, and support to enable an effective system of session-by-session monitoring. Our findings indicate that clinicians, administrative staff and young people and their parents/carers would support regular monitoring if the system is easy to implement, with a standard ‘clinic-wide’ adoption of the procedure, and the resulting data are clinically useful.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:09:53Z
format Article
id nottingham-30708
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:09:53Z
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-307082020-05-04T16:46:38Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/30708/ A qualitative process evaluation of electronic session-by-session outcome measurement in child and adolescent mental health services Hall, Charlotte L. Taylor, John Moldavsky, Maria Marriott, Michael Pass, Sarah Newell, Karen Goodman, Robert Sayal, Kapil Hollis, Chris Background Regular monitoring of patient progress is important to assess the clinical effectiveness of an intervention. Recently, initiatives within UK child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) have advocated the use of session-by-session monitoring to continually evaluate the patient’s outcome throughout the course of the intervention. However, the feasibility and acceptability of such regular monitoring is unknown. Method Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with clinicians (n = 10), administrative staff (n = 8) and families (n = 15) who participated in a feasibility study of an electronic session-by-session outcome monitoring tool, (SxS), which is based on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). This study took place in three CAMHS clinics in Nottinghamshire. The interview transcripts were thematically analysed. Results We found clinicians accepted the need to complete outcome measures, particularly valuing those completed by the patient. However, there were some difficulties with engaging clinicians in this practice and in the training offered. Generally, patients were supportive of completing SxS in the waiting room prior to the clinic session and assistance with the process from administrative staff was seen to be a key factor. Clinicians and families found the feedback reports created from SxS to be helpful for tracking progress, facilitating communication and engagement, and as a point of reflection. The use of technology was considered positively, although some technological difficulties hindered the completion of SxS. Clinicians and families appreciated the brevity of SxS, but some were concerned that a short questionnaire could not adequately encapsulate the complexity of the patient’s issues. Conclusions The findings show the need for appropriate infrastructure, mandatory training, and support to enable an effective system of session-by-session monitoring. Our findings indicate that clinicians, administrative staff and young people and their parents/carers would support regular monitoring if the system is easy to implement, with a standard ‘clinic-wide’ adoption of the procedure, and the resulting data are clinically useful. BioMed Central 2014-04-15 Article PeerReviewed Hall, Charlotte L., Taylor, John, Moldavsky, Maria, Marriott, Michael, Pass, Sarah, Newell, Karen, Goodman, Robert, Sayal, Kapil and Hollis, Chris (2014) A qualitative process evaluation of electronic session-by-session outcome measurement in child and adolescent mental health services. BMC Psychiatry, 14 (113). pp. 1-11. ISSN 1471-244X Session by session; CAMHS; Qualitative evaluation; Parent; Clinician; Outcome measures http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/14/113 doi:10.1186/1471-244X-14-113 doi:10.1186/1471-244X-14-113
spellingShingle Session by session; CAMHS; Qualitative evaluation; Parent; Clinician; Outcome measures
Hall, Charlotte L.
Taylor, John
Moldavsky, Maria
Marriott, Michael
Pass, Sarah
Newell, Karen
Goodman, Robert
Sayal, Kapil
Hollis, Chris
A qualitative process evaluation of electronic session-by-session outcome measurement in child and adolescent mental health services
title A qualitative process evaluation of electronic session-by-session outcome measurement in child and adolescent mental health services
title_full A qualitative process evaluation of electronic session-by-session outcome measurement in child and adolescent mental health services
title_fullStr A qualitative process evaluation of electronic session-by-session outcome measurement in child and adolescent mental health services
title_full_unstemmed A qualitative process evaluation of electronic session-by-session outcome measurement in child and adolescent mental health services
title_short A qualitative process evaluation of electronic session-by-session outcome measurement in child and adolescent mental health services
title_sort qualitative process evaluation of electronic session-by-session outcome measurement in child and adolescent mental health services
topic Session by session; CAMHS; Qualitative evaluation; Parent; Clinician; Outcome measures
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/30708/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/30708/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/30708/