Good act, poor implementation: the report of the House of Lords Post-Legislative Scrutiny Committee on the Mental Capacity Act 2005

The House of Lords Post-Legislative Scrutiny Committee on the Mental Capacity Act 2005 reported on 13 March 2014. This paper considers the findings and recommendations of the Committee, and in particular its two key recommendations – the establishment of an independent oversight body to co-ordinate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bartlett, Peter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Jordan 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/2990/
_version_ 1848790925390643200
author Bartlett, Peter
author_facet Bartlett, Peter
author_sort Bartlett, Peter
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description The House of Lords Post-Legislative Scrutiny Committee on the Mental Capacity Act 2005 reported on 13 March 2014. This paper considers the findings and recommendations of the Committee, and in particular its two key recommendations – the establishment of an independent oversight body to co-ordinate implementation of the Act, and the need to develop a replacement for the present deprivation of liberty safeguards (DOLS).
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:20:21Z
format Article
id nottingham-2990
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:20:21Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Jordan
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-29902017-10-14T09:51:59Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/2990/ Good act, poor implementation: the report of the House of Lords Post-Legislative Scrutiny Committee on the Mental Capacity Act 2005 Bartlett, Peter The House of Lords Post-Legislative Scrutiny Committee on the Mental Capacity Act 2005 reported on 13 March 2014. This paper considers the findings and recommendations of the Committee, and in particular its two key recommendations – the establishment of an independent oversight body to co-ordinate implementation of the Act, and the need to develop a replacement for the present deprivation of liberty safeguards (DOLS). Jordan 2014-07 Article NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/2990/1/Elder_Law_Journal_paper_14_04_02.pdf Bartlett, Peter (2014) Good act, poor implementation: the report of the House of Lords Post-Legislative Scrutiny Committee on the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Elder Law Journal, [2014] . p. 157. ISSN 2044-9593 (In Press) Mental Capacity Act Mental Capacity Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards DOLS House of Lords
spellingShingle Mental Capacity Act Mental Capacity Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards DOLS House of Lords
Bartlett, Peter
Good act, poor implementation: the report of the House of Lords Post-Legislative Scrutiny Committee on the Mental Capacity Act 2005
title Good act, poor implementation: the report of the House of Lords Post-Legislative Scrutiny Committee on the Mental Capacity Act 2005
title_full Good act, poor implementation: the report of the House of Lords Post-Legislative Scrutiny Committee on the Mental Capacity Act 2005
title_fullStr Good act, poor implementation: the report of the House of Lords Post-Legislative Scrutiny Committee on the Mental Capacity Act 2005
title_full_unstemmed Good act, poor implementation: the report of the House of Lords Post-Legislative Scrutiny Committee on the Mental Capacity Act 2005
title_short Good act, poor implementation: the report of the House of Lords Post-Legislative Scrutiny Committee on the Mental Capacity Act 2005
title_sort good act, poor implementation: the report of the house of lords post-legislative scrutiny committee on the mental capacity act 2005
topic Mental Capacity Act Mental Capacity Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards DOLS House of Lords
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/2990/