Promoting cooperation: the distribution of reward and punishment power

Recent work in experimental economics on the effectiveness of rewards and punishments for promoting cooperation mainly examines decentralized incentive systems where all group members can reward and/or punish one another. Many self-organizing groups and societies, however, concentrate the power to r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nosenzo, Daniele, Sefton, Martin
Other Authors: Van Lange, Paul A.M.
Format: Book Section
Published: Oxford University Press 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/29875/
_version_ 1848793870044758016
author Nosenzo, Daniele
Sefton, Martin
author2 Van Lange, Paul A.M.
author_facet Van Lange, Paul A.M.
Nosenzo, Daniele
Sefton, Martin
author_sort Nosenzo, Daniele
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Recent work in experimental economics on the effectiveness of rewards and punishments for promoting cooperation mainly examines decentralized incentive systems where all group members can reward and/or punish one another. Many self-organizing groups and societies, however, concentrate the power to reward or punish in the hands of a subset of group members (‘central monitors’). We review the literature on the relative merits of punishment and rewards when the distribution of incentive power is diffused across group members, as in most of the extant literature, and compare this with more recent work and new evidence showing how concentrating reward/punishment power in one group member affects cooperation.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:07:10Z
format Book Section
id nottingham-29875
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:07:10Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-298752020-05-04T16:48:17Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/29875/ Promoting cooperation: the distribution of reward and punishment power Nosenzo, Daniele Sefton, Martin Recent work in experimental economics on the effectiveness of rewards and punishments for promoting cooperation mainly examines decentralized incentive systems where all group members can reward and/or punish one another. Many self-organizing groups and societies, however, concentrate the power to reward or punish in the hands of a subset of group members (‘central monitors’). We review the literature on the relative merits of punishment and rewards when the distribution of incentive power is diffused across group members, as in most of the extant literature, and compare this with more recent work and new evidence showing how concentrating reward/punishment power in one group member affects cooperation. Oxford University Press Van Lange, Paul A.M. Rockenbach, Bettina Yamagishi, Toshio 2014-05-08 Book Section PeerReviewed Nosenzo, Daniele and Sefton, Martin (2014) Promoting cooperation: the distribution of reward and punishment power. In: Reward and punishment in social dilemmas. Series in human cooperation . Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 87-114. ISBN 9780199300730 Rewards; punishment; discretionary incentives; decentralized incentives; peer-to-peer incentives; centralized incentives; experiment.
spellingShingle Rewards; punishment; discretionary incentives; decentralized incentives; peer-to-peer incentives; centralized incentives; experiment.
Nosenzo, Daniele
Sefton, Martin
Promoting cooperation: the distribution of reward and punishment power
title Promoting cooperation: the distribution of reward and punishment power
title_full Promoting cooperation: the distribution of reward and punishment power
title_fullStr Promoting cooperation: the distribution of reward and punishment power
title_full_unstemmed Promoting cooperation: the distribution of reward and punishment power
title_short Promoting cooperation: the distribution of reward and punishment power
title_sort promoting cooperation: the distribution of reward and punishment power
topic Rewards; punishment; discretionary incentives; decentralized incentives; peer-to-peer incentives; centralized incentives; experiment.
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/29875/