Exposure to bisphosphonates and risk of common non-gastrointestinal cancers: series of nested case–control studies using two primary-care databases

Background: Bisphosphonates are the most commonly prescribed osteoporosis drugs but long-term effects are unclear, although antitumour properties are known from preclinical studies. Methods: Nested case–control studies were conducted to investigate bisphosphonate use and risks of common nongastroin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vinogradova, Yana, Coupland, Carol, Hippisley-Cox, Julia
Format: Article
Published: Cancer Research UK 2013
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/2981/
_version_ 1848790923436097536
author Vinogradova, Yana
Coupland, Carol
Hippisley-Cox, Julia
author_facet Vinogradova, Yana
Coupland, Carol
Hippisley-Cox, Julia
author_sort Vinogradova, Yana
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Bisphosphonates are the most commonly prescribed osteoporosis drugs but long-term effects are unclear, although antitumour properties are known from preclinical studies. Methods: Nested case–control studies were conducted to investigate bisphosphonate use and risks of common nongastrointestinal cancers (breast, prostate, lung, bladder, melanoma, ovarian, pancreas, uterus and cervical). Patients 50 years and older, diagnosed with primary cancers between 1997 and 2011, were matched to five controls using the UK practice-based QResearch and Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) databases. The databases were analysed separately and the results combined. Results: A total of 91 556 and 88 845 cases were identified from QResearch and CPRD, respectively. Bisphosphonate use was associated with reduced risks of breast (odds ratio (OR): 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87–0.97), prostate (OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79–0.96) and pancreatic (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68–0.93) cancers in the combined analyses, but no significant trends with duration. For alendronate, reduced risk associations were found for prostate cancer in the QResearch (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.70–0.93) and combined (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75–0.93) analyses (trend with duration P-values 0.009 and 0.001). There were no significant associations from any of the other analyses. Conclusion: In this series of large population-based case–control studies, bisphosphonate use was not associated with increased risks for any common non-gastrointestinal cancers.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:20:20Z
format Article
id nottingham-2981
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:20:20Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Cancer Research UK
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-29812020-05-04T16:37:53Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/2981/ Exposure to bisphosphonates and risk of common non-gastrointestinal cancers: series of nested case–control studies using two primary-care databases Vinogradova, Yana Coupland, Carol Hippisley-Cox, Julia Background: Bisphosphonates are the most commonly prescribed osteoporosis drugs but long-term effects are unclear, although antitumour properties are known from preclinical studies. Methods: Nested case–control studies were conducted to investigate bisphosphonate use and risks of common nongastrointestinal cancers (breast, prostate, lung, bladder, melanoma, ovarian, pancreas, uterus and cervical). Patients 50 years and older, diagnosed with primary cancers between 1997 and 2011, were matched to five controls using the UK practice-based QResearch and Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) databases. The databases were analysed separately and the results combined. Results: A total of 91 556 and 88 845 cases were identified from QResearch and CPRD, respectively. Bisphosphonate use was associated with reduced risks of breast (odds ratio (OR): 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87–0.97), prostate (OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79–0.96) and pancreatic (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68–0.93) cancers in the combined analyses, but no significant trends with duration. For alendronate, reduced risk associations were found for prostate cancer in the QResearch (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.70–0.93) and combined (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75–0.93) analyses (trend with duration P-values 0.009 and 0.001). There were no significant associations from any of the other analyses. Conclusion: In this series of large population-based case–control studies, bisphosphonate use was not associated with increased risks for any common non-gastrointestinal cancers. Cancer Research UK 2013-07-18 Article PeerReviewed Vinogradova, Yana, Coupland, Carol and Hippisley-Cox, Julia (2013) Exposure to bisphosphonates and risk of common non-gastrointestinal cancers: series of nested case–control studies using two primary-care databases. British Journal of Cancer, 109 . pp. 795-806. ISSN 0007-0920 http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v109/n3/full/bjc2013383a.html doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.383 doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.383
spellingShingle Vinogradova, Yana
Coupland, Carol
Hippisley-Cox, Julia
Exposure to bisphosphonates and risk of common non-gastrointestinal cancers: series of nested case–control studies using two primary-care databases
title Exposure to bisphosphonates and risk of common non-gastrointestinal cancers: series of nested case–control studies using two primary-care databases
title_full Exposure to bisphosphonates and risk of common non-gastrointestinal cancers: series of nested case–control studies using two primary-care databases
title_fullStr Exposure to bisphosphonates and risk of common non-gastrointestinal cancers: series of nested case–control studies using two primary-care databases
title_full_unstemmed Exposure to bisphosphonates and risk of common non-gastrointestinal cancers: series of nested case–control studies using two primary-care databases
title_short Exposure to bisphosphonates and risk of common non-gastrointestinal cancers: series of nested case–control studies using two primary-care databases
title_sort exposure to bisphosphonates and risk of common non-gastrointestinal cancers: series of nested case–control studies using two primary-care databases
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/2981/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/2981/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/2981/