Subsidiarity and the European Convention on Human Rights

Theoretical views on the concept of subsidiarity are examined followed by an analysis of the origins of the principle of subsidiarity within the ECHR. The Court’s utilisation of the principle, as disclosed by the jurisprudence, is studied across three time periods encompassing the original part-time...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mowbray, Alastair
Format: Article
Published: Oxford University Press 2015
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/29467/
_version_ 1848793792056918016
author Mowbray, Alastair
author_facet Mowbray, Alastair
author_sort Mowbray, Alastair
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Theoretical views on the concept of subsidiarity are examined followed by an analysis of the origins of the principle of subsidiarity within the ECHR. The Court’s utilisation of the principle, as disclosed by the jurisprudence, is studied across three time periods encompassing the original part-time Court, the first decade of the full-time Court and the post-Interlaken era. This is supplemented by a consideration of some quantitative data, derived from the Court’s HUDOC database, on the usage of subsidiarity in the case reports of Court judgments. Particular attention is given to Grand Chamber judgments since 2010. Overall conclusions are then drawn on, inter alia, whether the Court’s use of the principle has altered over time, whether the principle is simply a device to limit the authority of the Court, who can benefit from the application of the principle and what links may be made between the theoretical writings and the actual judgments delivered at Strasbourg.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:05:55Z
format Article
id nottingham-29467
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:05:55Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-294672020-05-04T17:06:54Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/29467/ Subsidiarity and the European Convention on Human Rights Mowbray, Alastair Theoretical views on the concept of subsidiarity are examined followed by an analysis of the origins of the principle of subsidiarity within the ECHR. The Court’s utilisation of the principle, as disclosed by the jurisprudence, is studied across three time periods encompassing the original part-time Court, the first decade of the full-time Court and the post-Interlaken era. This is supplemented by a consideration of some quantitative data, derived from the Court’s HUDOC database, on the usage of subsidiarity in the case reports of Court judgments. Particular attention is given to Grand Chamber judgments since 2010. Overall conclusions are then drawn on, inter alia, whether the Court’s use of the principle has altered over time, whether the principle is simply a device to limit the authority of the Court, who can benefit from the application of the principle and what links may be made between the theoretical writings and the actual judgments delivered at Strasbourg. Oxford University Press 2015-04-14 Article PeerReviewed Mowbray, Alastair (2015) Subsidiarity and the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, 15 (2). pp. 313-341. ISSN 1461-7781 http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/content/15/2/313 doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngv002 doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngv002
spellingShingle Mowbray, Alastair
Subsidiarity and the European Convention on Human Rights
title Subsidiarity and the European Convention on Human Rights
title_full Subsidiarity and the European Convention on Human Rights
title_fullStr Subsidiarity and the European Convention on Human Rights
title_full_unstemmed Subsidiarity and the European Convention on Human Rights
title_short Subsidiarity and the European Convention on Human Rights
title_sort subsidiarity and the european convention on human rights
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/29467/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/29467/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/29467/