Seeing the landscape for the trees: metrics to guide riparian shade management in river catchments

Rising water temperature (Tw) due to anthropogenic climate change may have serious consequences for river ecosystems. Conservation and/or expansion of riparian shade could counter warming and buy time for ecosystems to adapt. However, sensitivity of river reaches to direct solar radiation is highly...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johnson, Matthew F., Wilby, Robert L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/29020/
_version_ 1848793698060468224
author Johnson, Matthew F.
Wilby, Robert L.
author_facet Johnson, Matthew F.
Wilby, Robert L.
author_sort Johnson, Matthew F.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Rising water temperature (Tw) due to anthropogenic climate change may have serious consequences for river ecosystems. Conservation and/or expansion of riparian shade could counter warming and buy time for ecosystems to adapt. However, sensitivity of river reaches to direct solar radiation is highly heterogeneous in space and time, so benefits of shading are also expected to be site specific. We use a network of high-resolution temperature measurements from two upland rivers in the UK, in conjunction with topographic shade modelling, to assess the relative significance of landscape and riparian shade to the thermal behaviour of river reaches. Trees occupy 7% of the study catchments (comparable with the UK national average) yet shade covers 52% of the area and is concentrated along river corridors. Riparian shade is most beneficial for managing Tw at distances 5 to 20 km downstream from the source of the rivers where discharge is modest, flow is dominated by near-surface hydrological pathways, there is a wide floodplain with little landscape shade, and where cumulative solar exposure times are sufficient to affect Tw. For the rivers studied, we find that approximately 0.5 km of complete shade is necessary to off-set Tw by 1°C during July (the month with peak Tw) at a headwater site; whereas 1.1 km of shade is required 25 km downstream. Further research is needed to assess the integrated effect of future changes in air temperature, sunshine duration, direct solar radiation and downward diffuse radiation on Tw to help tree planting schemes achieve intended outcomes.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:04:26Z
format Article
id nottingham-29020
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:04:26Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Wiley
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-290202020-05-08T12:45:13Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/29020/ Seeing the landscape for the trees: metrics to guide riparian shade management in river catchments Johnson, Matthew F. Wilby, Robert L. Rising water temperature (Tw) due to anthropogenic climate change may have serious consequences for river ecosystems. Conservation and/or expansion of riparian shade could counter warming and buy time for ecosystems to adapt. However, sensitivity of river reaches to direct solar radiation is highly heterogeneous in space and time, so benefits of shading are also expected to be site specific. We use a network of high-resolution temperature measurements from two upland rivers in the UK, in conjunction with topographic shade modelling, to assess the relative significance of landscape and riparian shade to the thermal behaviour of river reaches. Trees occupy 7% of the study catchments (comparable with the UK national average) yet shade covers 52% of the area and is concentrated along river corridors. Riparian shade is most beneficial for managing Tw at distances 5 to 20 km downstream from the source of the rivers where discharge is modest, flow is dominated by near-surface hydrological pathways, there is a wide floodplain with little landscape shade, and where cumulative solar exposure times are sufficient to affect Tw. For the rivers studied, we find that approximately 0.5 km of complete shade is necessary to off-set Tw by 1°C during July (the month with peak Tw) at a headwater site; whereas 1.1 km of shade is required 25 km downstream. Further research is needed to assess the integrated effect of future changes in air temperature, sunshine duration, direct solar radiation and downward diffuse radiation on Tw to help tree planting schemes achieve intended outcomes. Wiley 2015-05-27 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/29020/7/Johnson%20and%20Wilby%2C%20Water%20Resources%20Research_29020.pdf Johnson, Matthew F. and Wilby, Robert L. (2015) Seeing the landscape for the trees: metrics to guide riparian shade management in river catchments. Water Resources Research, 51 (5). pp. 3754-3769. ISSN 0043-1397 Riparian; buffer strip; heat capacity; climate change; thermal refugia; water temperature http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2014WR016802/full doi:10.1002/2014WR016802 doi:10.1002/2014WR016802
spellingShingle Riparian; buffer strip; heat capacity; climate change; thermal refugia; water temperature
Johnson, Matthew F.
Wilby, Robert L.
Seeing the landscape for the trees: metrics to guide riparian shade management in river catchments
title Seeing the landscape for the trees: metrics to guide riparian shade management in river catchments
title_full Seeing the landscape for the trees: metrics to guide riparian shade management in river catchments
title_fullStr Seeing the landscape for the trees: metrics to guide riparian shade management in river catchments
title_full_unstemmed Seeing the landscape for the trees: metrics to guide riparian shade management in river catchments
title_short Seeing the landscape for the trees: metrics to guide riparian shade management in river catchments
title_sort seeing the landscape for the trees: metrics to guide riparian shade management in river catchments
topic Riparian; buffer strip; heat capacity; climate change; thermal refugia; water temperature
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/29020/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/29020/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/29020/