Clarifying value in use and value creation process

Current marketing literature, regardless of its underlying paradigm/logic, lacks consensus on how to conceptualise value creation, how to define what it entails, along with by whom, how, where and when it is created (Voima et al., 2010). It is no surprise then that the value creation process is ofte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Popesku, Mihajlo
Format: Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/28558/
_version_ 1848793595015856128
author Popesku, Mihajlo
author_facet Popesku, Mihajlo
author_sort Popesku, Mihajlo
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Current marketing literature, regardless of its underlying paradigm/logic, lacks consensus on how to conceptualise value creation, how to define what it entails, along with by whom, how, where and when it is created (Voima et al., 2010). It is no surprise then that the value creation process is often described as a ‘black box’ (Grönroos, 2011b; Leroy et al., 2013). In this doctoral research the customer’s perspective on value creation has been advocated. Research was conducted using mixed methods in the context of digital camera usage. It was found that value creation process consists of inputs (resources, customer and other socio-economic actors), 5 value creation phases (this is actually the content of black box: usage episode initiation, resource selection, resource adjustment, resource integration and evaluation) and outputs (side effects and value-in-use as a mix of instrumental benefits, experiential benefits, symbolic benefits and sacrifices;). Simultaneously to value creation, each consumption episode provides an opportunity for customer’s episodic learning that can result in customer’s augmented or new knowledge, skills and experience. Research found value to be episodic phenomenon, while value creation consistent with Roggeveen et al. (2012), was found to be cyclical and non-linear, showing how unpredictable the unique value creation path of an individual customer can be. This indicates that a value creation episode can evolve in unique ways depending on the sequence of value creation phases, given that customers may revisit already visited value creation phases (unless resources are not destroyed). In this way, while the study acknowledges the idiosyncrasies of individual customers’ approaches, on the other hand, it provides a theoretically structured view of this inherently idiosyncratic process.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:02:47Z
format Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-28558
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:02:47Z
publishDate 2015
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-285582025-02-28T11:33:58Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/28558/ Clarifying value in use and value creation process Popesku, Mihajlo Current marketing literature, regardless of its underlying paradigm/logic, lacks consensus on how to conceptualise value creation, how to define what it entails, along with by whom, how, where and when it is created (Voima et al., 2010). It is no surprise then that the value creation process is often described as a ‘black box’ (Grönroos, 2011b; Leroy et al., 2013). In this doctoral research the customer’s perspective on value creation has been advocated. Research was conducted using mixed methods in the context of digital camera usage. It was found that value creation process consists of inputs (resources, customer and other socio-economic actors), 5 value creation phases (this is actually the content of black box: usage episode initiation, resource selection, resource adjustment, resource integration and evaluation) and outputs (side effects and value-in-use as a mix of instrumental benefits, experiential benefits, symbolic benefits and sacrifices;). Simultaneously to value creation, each consumption episode provides an opportunity for customer’s episodic learning that can result in customer’s augmented or new knowledge, skills and experience. Research found value to be episodic phenomenon, while value creation consistent with Roggeveen et al. (2012), was found to be cyclical and non-linear, showing how unpredictable the unique value creation path of an individual customer can be. This indicates that a value creation episode can evolve in unique ways depending on the sequence of value creation phases, given that customers may revisit already visited value creation phases (unless resources are not destroyed). In this way, while the study acknowledges the idiosyncrasies of individual customers’ approaches, on the other hand, it provides a theoretically structured view of this inherently idiosyncratic process. 2015-07-07 Thesis (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en arr https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/28558/1/Mihajlo%20Popesku%20-%20PhD%20thesis.pdf Popesku, Mihajlo (2015) Clarifying value in use and value creation process. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. Service-Dominant logic service logic value value-in-use value co-creation model customer’s independent value creation model resource adjustment resource integration evaluation episodic learning mixed methods PLS-SEM
spellingShingle Service-Dominant logic
service logic
value
value-in-use
value co-creation model
customer’s independent value creation model
resource adjustment
resource integration
evaluation
episodic learning
mixed methods
PLS-SEM
Popesku, Mihajlo
Clarifying value in use and value creation process
title Clarifying value in use and value creation process
title_full Clarifying value in use and value creation process
title_fullStr Clarifying value in use and value creation process
title_full_unstemmed Clarifying value in use and value creation process
title_short Clarifying value in use and value creation process
title_sort clarifying value in use and value creation process
topic Service-Dominant logic
service logic
value
value-in-use
value co-creation model
customer’s independent value creation model
resource adjustment
resource integration
evaluation
episodic learning
mixed methods
PLS-SEM
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/28558/