Can GPs working in secure environments in England re-license using the Royal College of General Practitioners revalidation proposals?
Background Revalidation for UK doctors is expected to be introduced from late 2012. For general practitioners (GPs), this entails collecting supporting information to be submitted and assessed in a revalidation portfolio every five years. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of GPs...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
| Online Access: | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/2761/ |
| _version_ | 1848790869379907584 |
|---|---|
| author | Coomber, Jane Charlton, Rodger Thistlethwaite, Jill E. England, Liz |
| author_facet | Coomber, Jane Charlton, Rodger Thistlethwaite, Jill E. England, Liz |
| author_sort | Coomber, Jane |
| building | Nottingham Research Data Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Background
Revalidation for UK doctors is expected to be introduced from late 2012. For general practitioners (GPs), this entails collecting supporting information to be submitted and assessed in a revalidation portfolio every five years. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of GPs working in secure environments to collect supporting information for the Royal College of General Practitioners’ (RCGP) proposed revalidation portfolio.
Methods
We invited GPs working in secure environments in England to submit items of supporting information collected during the previous 12 months using criteria and standards required for the proposed RCGP revalidation portfolio and complete a GP issues log. Initial focus groups and initial and follow-up semi-structured face-to-face and telephone interviews were held to explore GPs’ views of this process. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and identifying themes respectively.
Results
Of the 50 GPs who consented to participate in the study, 20 submitted a portfolio. Thirty-eight GPs participated in an initial interview, nine took part in a follow-up interview and 17 completed a GP issues log. GPs reported difficulty in collecting supporting information for valid patient feedback, full-cycle clinical audits and evidence for their extended practice role(s) as sessional practitioners in the high population turnover custodial environment. Peripatetic practitioners experienced more difficulty than their institution based counterparts collating this evidence.
Conclusions
GPs working in secure environments may experience difficulties in collecting the newer types of supporting information for the proposed RCGP revalidation portfolio primarily due to their employment status within a non-medical environment and characteristics of the detainee population. Increased support from secure environment service commissioners and employers will be a prerequisite for these practitioners to enable them to re-license using the RCGP revalidation proposals. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T18:19:28Z |
| format | Article |
| id | nottingham-2761 |
| institution | University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T18:19:28Z |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publisher | BioMed Central |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | nottingham-27612020-05-04T16:34:55Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/2761/ Can GPs working in secure environments in England re-license using the Royal College of General Practitioners revalidation proposals? Coomber, Jane Charlton, Rodger Thistlethwaite, Jill E. England, Liz Background Revalidation for UK doctors is expected to be introduced from late 2012. For general practitioners (GPs), this entails collecting supporting information to be submitted and assessed in a revalidation portfolio every five years. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of GPs working in secure environments to collect supporting information for the Royal College of General Practitioners’ (RCGP) proposed revalidation portfolio. Methods We invited GPs working in secure environments in England to submit items of supporting information collected during the previous 12 months using criteria and standards required for the proposed RCGP revalidation portfolio and complete a GP issues log. Initial focus groups and initial and follow-up semi-structured face-to-face and telephone interviews were held to explore GPs’ views of this process. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and identifying themes respectively. Results Of the 50 GPs who consented to participate in the study, 20 submitted a portfolio. Thirty-eight GPs participated in an initial interview, nine took part in a follow-up interview and 17 completed a GP issues log. GPs reported difficulty in collecting supporting information for valid patient feedback, full-cycle clinical audits and evidence for their extended practice role(s) as sessional practitioners in the high population turnover custodial environment. Peripatetic practitioners experienced more difficulty than their institution based counterparts collating this evidence. Conclusions GPs working in secure environments may experience difficulties in collecting the newer types of supporting information for the proposed RCGP revalidation portfolio primarily due to their employment status within a non-medical environment and characteristics of the detainee population. Increased support from secure environment service commissioners and employers will be a prerequisite for these practitioners to enable them to re-license using the RCGP revalidation proposals. BioMed Central 2012-12-20 Article PeerReviewed Coomber, Jane, Charlton, Rodger, Thistlethwaite, Jill E. and England, Liz (2012) Can GPs working in secure environments in England re-license using the Royal College of General Practitioners revalidation proposals? BMC Family Practice, 13 (123). ISSN 1471-2296 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/13/123 doi:10.1186/1471-2296-13-123 doi:10.1186/1471-2296-13-123 |
| spellingShingle | Coomber, Jane Charlton, Rodger Thistlethwaite, Jill E. England, Liz Can GPs working in secure environments in England re-license using the Royal College of General Practitioners revalidation proposals? |
| title | Can GPs working in secure environments in England re-license using the Royal College of General Practitioners revalidation proposals? |
| title_full | Can GPs working in secure environments in England re-license using the Royal College of General Practitioners revalidation proposals? |
| title_fullStr | Can GPs working in secure environments in England re-license using the Royal College of General Practitioners revalidation proposals? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Can GPs working in secure environments in England re-license using the Royal College of General Practitioners revalidation proposals? |
| title_short | Can GPs working in secure environments in England re-license using the Royal College of General Practitioners revalidation proposals? |
| title_sort | can gps working in secure environments in england re-license using the royal college of general practitioners revalidation proposals? |
| url | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/2761/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/2761/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/2761/ |