Operational Risk Management; An analysis of FSA Final Notices

In the last two decades, financial markets have been highlighted by large-scale financial failures due to incompetence and fraud, such as Barings, Daiwa, Allied Irish Banks, UBS, Société Génerale, and more recently JP Morgan. While previous research has focussed on market and credit risk, and even i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: van den Aarssen, Daniel
Format: Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2013
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/26837/
_version_ 1848793256957050880
author van den Aarssen, Daniel
author_facet van den Aarssen, Daniel
author_sort van den Aarssen, Daniel
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description In the last two decades, financial markets have been highlighted by large-scale financial failures due to incompetence and fraud, such as Barings, Daiwa, Allied Irish Banks, UBS, Société Génerale, and more recently JP Morgan. While previous research has focussed on market and credit risk, and even if the focus was on operational risk it concentrates on the market reaction to operational losses, the current research addresses the root of the problem. The current research explores the final notices issued by the FSA (now FCA and PRA) of over £1,000,000 from 2008-2013 in order to find a common theme in the operational risks of the financial institutions. In order to categorise the final notices a framework by McConnell (2008) has been adopted. With the help of this framework the risks are more accurately distinguished in either an incident, individual, institution, or industry area. The data analysis the frequently breached principles outlined by the FSA ‘principles for business’. The results from this allow the accurate categorisation of each case, and allow us to see where financial institution most often commit operational risks. The findings indicate that the vast majority of operational risks occur on an institutional level; however, the findings also show that no cases were attributed to solely the incident or industry area. Furthermore, two subcategories have been created in order to place the cases more accurately, these subcategories are a combination of the already existing areas; the individual and institution area, and the industry and institution area. This makes the tally for institutional area increase, and results in only 3 cases involving no institutional factors whatsoever. With these results suggestions to minimise the frequency and severity of operational risks are made in the form of adopting either a new regulatory body, which has already happened. The further suggestions include adopting a Dodd-Frank Act stress testing similar approach to risk management of financial institutions, or applying the Enterprise Wide Risk Management (EWRM) framework in order to stop risks in the earlier stages. However, it is important to consider the definition of risk, as it is not necessarily deemed a bad thing, especially for financial institutions who most take some risks in order to maintain competitive and profitable, the suggestions are therefore recommendations on determining what the good, and the bad risks are.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:57:25Z
format Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-26837
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:57:25Z
publishDate 2013
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-268372017-10-19T13:39:10Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/26837/ Operational Risk Management; An analysis of FSA Final Notices van den Aarssen, Daniel In the last two decades, financial markets have been highlighted by large-scale financial failures due to incompetence and fraud, such as Barings, Daiwa, Allied Irish Banks, UBS, Société Génerale, and more recently JP Morgan. While previous research has focussed on market and credit risk, and even if the focus was on operational risk it concentrates on the market reaction to operational losses, the current research addresses the root of the problem. The current research explores the final notices issued by the FSA (now FCA and PRA) of over £1,000,000 from 2008-2013 in order to find a common theme in the operational risks of the financial institutions. In order to categorise the final notices a framework by McConnell (2008) has been adopted. With the help of this framework the risks are more accurately distinguished in either an incident, individual, institution, or industry area. The data analysis the frequently breached principles outlined by the FSA ‘principles for business’. The results from this allow the accurate categorisation of each case, and allow us to see where financial institution most often commit operational risks. The findings indicate that the vast majority of operational risks occur on an institutional level; however, the findings also show that no cases were attributed to solely the incident or industry area. Furthermore, two subcategories have been created in order to place the cases more accurately, these subcategories are a combination of the already existing areas; the individual and institution area, and the industry and institution area. This makes the tally for institutional area increase, and results in only 3 cases involving no institutional factors whatsoever. With these results suggestions to minimise the frequency and severity of operational risks are made in the form of adopting either a new regulatory body, which has already happened. The further suggestions include adopting a Dodd-Frank Act stress testing similar approach to risk management of financial institutions, or applying the Enterprise Wide Risk Management (EWRM) framework in order to stop risks in the earlier stages. However, it is important to consider the definition of risk, as it is not necessarily deemed a bad thing, especially for financial institutions who most take some risks in order to maintain competitive and profitable, the suggestions are therefore recommendations on determining what the good, and the bad risks are. 2013-09-27 Dissertation (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/26837/1/Dissertation_Final.pdf van den Aarssen, Daniel (2013) Operational Risk Management; An analysis of FSA Final Notices. [Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)] (Unpublished)
spellingShingle van den Aarssen, Daniel
Operational Risk Management; An analysis of FSA Final Notices
title Operational Risk Management; An analysis of FSA Final Notices
title_full Operational Risk Management; An analysis of FSA Final Notices
title_fullStr Operational Risk Management; An analysis of FSA Final Notices
title_full_unstemmed Operational Risk Management; An analysis of FSA Final Notices
title_short Operational Risk Management; An analysis of FSA Final Notices
title_sort operational risk management; an analysis of fsa final notices
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/26837/