A Robustness Test of the Berger Complete Model: Evidence from Germany

This piece of work aims to test the robustness of the Berger Complete Model; this is because varying methods of calculating the efficiencies may give rise to different hypotheses and therefore policy decisions. The four hypotheses are SCP, RMP, X-EFF and S-EFF. In order to test this; technical and s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sharma, D
Format: Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2013
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/26544/
_version_ 1848793194064510976
author Sharma, D
author_facet Sharma, D
author_sort Sharma, D
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description This piece of work aims to test the robustness of the Berger Complete Model; this is because varying methods of calculating the efficiencies may give rise to different hypotheses and therefore policy decisions. The four hypotheses are SCP, RMP, X-EFF and S-EFF. In order to test this; technical and scale efficiencies were calculated using the Error Component (EC) and Technical Efficiency (TE) models, these were then used in the Berger Complete Model. This study found that there was a difference in outcome when using efficiencies from the EC and TE methods of calculation. When using data from the EC and TE models in GLS estimation there was support for the SCP hypothesis. However when using the GMM estimation, the EC data gave the SCP outcome, whereas the TE data gave evidence for RMP.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:56:25Z
format Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-26544
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:56:25Z
publishDate 2013
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-265442017-10-19T13:27:10Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/26544/ A Robustness Test of the Berger Complete Model: Evidence from Germany Sharma, D This piece of work aims to test the robustness of the Berger Complete Model; this is because varying methods of calculating the efficiencies may give rise to different hypotheses and therefore policy decisions. The four hypotheses are SCP, RMP, X-EFF and S-EFF. In order to test this; technical and scale efficiencies were calculated using the Error Component (EC) and Technical Efficiency (TE) models, these were then used in the Berger Complete Model. This study found that there was a difference in outcome when using efficiencies from the EC and TE methods of calculation. When using data from the EC and TE models in GLS estimation there was support for the SCP hypothesis. However when using the GMM estimation, the EC data gave the SCP outcome, whereas the TE data gave evidence for RMP. 2013-12 Dissertation (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/26544/1/DevSharma.pdf Sharma, D (2013) A Robustness Test of the Berger Complete Model: Evidence from Germany. [Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)] (Unpublished)
spellingShingle Sharma, D
A Robustness Test of the Berger Complete Model: Evidence from Germany
title A Robustness Test of the Berger Complete Model: Evidence from Germany
title_full A Robustness Test of the Berger Complete Model: Evidence from Germany
title_fullStr A Robustness Test of the Berger Complete Model: Evidence from Germany
title_full_unstemmed A Robustness Test of the Berger Complete Model: Evidence from Germany
title_short A Robustness Test of the Berger Complete Model: Evidence from Germany
title_sort robustness test of the berger complete model: evidence from germany
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/26544/