Forecast accuracy test of stochastic volatility models: traditional models vs Volatility Hang Seng Index

There are many researchers doing the work of evaluating the forecast performance between ARCH or GARCH type of volatility models and implied volatility index (mostly VIX). Since people have realised the importance of VIX now, the study about the forecast ability of implied volatility index model is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pan, Fangxin
Format: Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2013
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/26541/
_version_ 1848793193515057152
author Pan, Fangxin
author_facet Pan, Fangxin
author_sort Pan, Fangxin
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description There are many researchers doing the work of evaluating the forecast performance between ARCH or GARCH type of volatility models and implied volatility index (mostly VIX). Since people have realised the importance of VIX now, the study about the forecast ability of implied volatility index model is emphasized. In this paper, the author has compared eight different models including the ARCH and GARCH model with the implied volatility index Volatility index of Hang Seng index which is seldom studied in literature. The importance and development of volatility index has been discussed. The difference between VIX and Hang Seng Volatility index has also been discussed in details. A history of similar empirical work has been displayed. The work has also provided the detailed methodology that has been used in this paper.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:56:24Z
format Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-26541
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:56:24Z
publishDate 2013
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-265412017-10-19T13:29:00Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/26541/ Forecast accuracy test of stochastic volatility models: traditional models vs Volatility Hang Seng Index Pan, Fangxin There are many researchers doing the work of evaluating the forecast performance between ARCH or GARCH type of volatility models and implied volatility index (mostly VIX). Since people have realised the importance of VIX now, the study about the forecast ability of implied volatility index model is emphasized. In this paper, the author has compared eight different models including the ARCH and GARCH model with the implied volatility index Volatility index of Hang Seng index which is seldom studied in literature. The importance and development of volatility index has been discussed. The difference between VIX and Hang Seng Volatility index has also been discussed in details. A history of similar empirical work has been displayed. The work has also provided the detailed methodology that has been used in this paper. 2013-09-17 Dissertation (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/26541/1/dissertation.pdf Pan, Fangxin (2013) Forecast accuracy test of stochastic volatility models: traditional models vs Volatility Hang Seng Index. [Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)] (Unpublished)
spellingShingle Pan, Fangxin
Forecast accuracy test of stochastic volatility models: traditional models vs Volatility Hang Seng Index
title Forecast accuracy test of stochastic volatility models: traditional models vs Volatility Hang Seng Index
title_full Forecast accuracy test of stochastic volatility models: traditional models vs Volatility Hang Seng Index
title_fullStr Forecast accuracy test of stochastic volatility models: traditional models vs Volatility Hang Seng Index
title_full_unstemmed Forecast accuracy test of stochastic volatility models: traditional models vs Volatility Hang Seng Index
title_short Forecast accuracy test of stochastic volatility models: traditional models vs Volatility Hang Seng Index
title_sort forecast accuracy test of stochastic volatility models: traditional models vs volatility hang seng index
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/26541/