Do countries adopt a mimicry process to tackle the issue of climate change? An international comparative analysis of the carbon economy with specific reference to the EU, Australia, China and Indonesia

Climate change is a serious and urgent issue caused by the increasing greenhouse gases emitted into the atmosphere from human activities. The changes in the physical world resulting from rising global temperatures are likely, if anything, to be more harmful than earlier believed. The Kyoto Protocol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ratnatunga, Shehan Tissa Mahendra
Format: Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2012
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/25605/
_version_ 1848793015712219136
author Ratnatunga, Shehan Tissa Mahendra
author_facet Ratnatunga, Shehan Tissa Mahendra
author_sort Ratnatunga, Shehan Tissa Mahendra
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Climate change is a serious and urgent issue caused by the increasing greenhouse gases emitted into the atmosphere from human activities. The changes in the physical world resulting from rising global temperatures are likely, if anything, to be more harmful than earlier believed. The Kyoto Protocol was the first international treaty signed in 1998 which attempted to address the adverse impacts of climate change by committing ratifying countries to attaining agreed targets on emissions reduction. As there is no mandatory prescription for a decarbonising policy framework, a wide variety of carbon-reducing policy instruments can be observed in different countries each with its own different compliance requirements. The objective of this research study was to understand if national governments adopt a mimicry approach when developing a set of structures and practices in responding to the climate change issue as expected by the institutional isomorphism form of Neo-institutional theory. By selecting the EU and Australia to represent the developed economies and China and Indonesia to represent the developing nations, this study adopted a Neo-institutional framework to identify the influences of local institutions in defining how governments develop such response measures. The study finds that at present, there is no indication of consistent mimicry process adopted by governments in responding to the climate change issue. The access to capital assets and the perceived levels of risks differ from each economy. Therefore national carbon policies are being developed by governments targeted at the key causes of their respective high emission levels and so as they will have minimal impacts on national interests. However, as the carbon field becomes more mature and more late-adopting countries join the climate movement, the degree of convergence in decarbonisation policies amongst countries will increase driving isomorphic diffusion.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:53:35Z
format Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-25605
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:53:35Z
publishDate 2012
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-256052017-12-28T03:36:44Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/25605/ Do countries adopt a mimicry process to tackle the issue of climate change? An international comparative analysis of the carbon economy with specific reference to the EU, Australia, China and Indonesia Ratnatunga, Shehan Tissa Mahendra Climate change is a serious and urgent issue caused by the increasing greenhouse gases emitted into the atmosphere from human activities. The changes in the physical world resulting from rising global temperatures are likely, if anything, to be more harmful than earlier believed. The Kyoto Protocol was the first international treaty signed in 1998 which attempted to address the adverse impacts of climate change by committing ratifying countries to attaining agreed targets on emissions reduction. As there is no mandatory prescription for a decarbonising policy framework, a wide variety of carbon-reducing policy instruments can be observed in different countries each with its own different compliance requirements. The objective of this research study was to understand if national governments adopt a mimicry approach when developing a set of structures and practices in responding to the climate change issue as expected by the institutional isomorphism form of Neo-institutional theory. By selecting the EU and Australia to represent the developed economies and China and Indonesia to represent the developing nations, this study adopted a Neo-institutional framework to identify the influences of local institutions in defining how governments develop such response measures. The study finds that at present, there is no indication of consistent mimicry process adopted by governments in responding to the climate change issue. The access to capital assets and the perceived levels of risks differ from each economy. Therefore national carbon policies are being developed by governments targeted at the key causes of their respective high emission levels and so as they will have minimal impacts on national interests. However, as the carbon field becomes more mature and more late-adopting countries join the climate movement, the degree of convergence in decarbonisation policies amongst countries will increase driving isomorphic diffusion. 2012-09-11 Dissertation (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/25605/1/12MBAlixstr.pdf Ratnatunga, Shehan Tissa Mahendra (2012) Do countries adopt a mimicry process to tackle the issue of climate change? An international comparative analysis of the carbon economy with specific reference to the EU, Australia, China and Indonesia. [Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)] (Unpublished)
spellingShingle Ratnatunga, Shehan Tissa Mahendra
Do countries adopt a mimicry process to tackle the issue of climate change? An international comparative analysis of the carbon economy with specific reference to the EU, Australia, China and Indonesia
title Do countries adopt a mimicry process to tackle the issue of climate change? An international comparative analysis of the carbon economy with specific reference to the EU, Australia, China and Indonesia
title_full Do countries adopt a mimicry process to tackle the issue of climate change? An international comparative analysis of the carbon economy with specific reference to the EU, Australia, China and Indonesia
title_fullStr Do countries adopt a mimicry process to tackle the issue of climate change? An international comparative analysis of the carbon economy with specific reference to the EU, Australia, China and Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed Do countries adopt a mimicry process to tackle the issue of climate change? An international comparative analysis of the carbon economy with specific reference to the EU, Australia, China and Indonesia
title_short Do countries adopt a mimicry process to tackle the issue of climate change? An international comparative analysis of the carbon economy with specific reference to the EU, Australia, China and Indonesia
title_sort do countries adopt a mimicry process to tackle the issue of climate change? an international comparative analysis of the carbon economy with specific reference to the eu, australia, china and indonesia
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/25605/