Testing the Behavioral Life-Cycle Model fore Saving and Consumption.

Abstract The conflict between behavioral finance and standard finance came to the attention of economists since they recognized the importance of psychology in finance. This paper focuses on the empirical study of the behavioral life-cycle model that is a derivative model based on three concepts of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Huang, Yanjun
Format: Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2007
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/21174/
_version_ 1848792200577548288
author Huang, Yanjun
author_facet Huang, Yanjun
author_sort Huang, Yanjun
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Abstract The conflict between behavioral finance and standard finance came to the attention of economists since they recognized the importance of psychology in finance. This paper focuses on the empirical study of the behavioral life-cycle model that is a derivative model based on three concepts of behavioral finance, including self-control, mental accounting, and frame dependence. Through testing the differential marginal propensity to consume (MPC) hypothesis and the magnitude of the offset between pension saving and discretionary saving, the results show that the empirical evidence is more consistent with behavioral life-cycle theory.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:40:38Z
format Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-21174
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:40:38Z
publishDate 2007
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-211742018-01-14T22:19:09Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/21174/ Testing the Behavioral Life-Cycle Model fore Saving and Consumption. Huang, Yanjun Abstract The conflict between behavioral finance and standard finance came to the attention of economists since they recognized the importance of psychology in finance. This paper focuses on the empirical study of the behavioral life-cycle model that is a derivative model based on three concepts of behavioral finance, including self-control, mental accounting, and frame dependence. Through testing the differential marginal propensity to consume (MPC) hypothesis and the magnitude of the offset between pension saving and discretionary saving, the results show that the empirical evidence is more consistent with behavioral life-cycle theory. 2007 Dissertation (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/21174/1/07MAlixyh10_%282%29YanYun.pdf Huang, Yanjun (2007) Testing the Behavioral Life-Cycle Model fore Saving and Consumption. [Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)] (Unpublished)
spellingShingle Huang, Yanjun
Testing the Behavioral Life-Cycle Model fore Saving and Consumption.
title Testing the Behavioral Life-Cycle Model fore Saving and Consumption.
title_full Testing the Behavioral Life-Cycle Model fore Saving and Consumption.
title_fullStr Testing the Behavioral Life-Cycle Model fore Saving and Consumption.
title_full_unstemmed Testing the Behavioral Life-Cycle Model fore Saving and Consumption.
title_short Testing the Behavioral Life-Cycle Model fore Saving and Consumption.
title_sort testing the behavioral life-cycle model fore saving and consumption.
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/21174/