Modern trends in evidence scholarship: is all rosy in the garden?
This article reviews the state of evidence scholarship in the early 21st century and argues that it has been enriched by drawing upon a range of different disciplines including social psychology,cognitive science, forensic psychology, mathematics, linguistics and economics. It argues for the relevan...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Quinnipiac University School of Law
2003
|
| Online Access: | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/2078/ |
| _version_ | 1848790716890742784 |
|---|---|
| author | Jackson, John |
| author_facet | Jackson, John |
| author_sort | Jackson, John |
| building | Nottingham Research Data Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | This article reviews the state of evidence scholarship in the early 21st century and argues that it has been enriched by drawing upon a range of different disciplines including social psychology,cognitive science, forensic psychology, mathematics, linguistics and economics. It argues for the relevance of sociological, historical and comparative approaches as a useful corrective aganst the dominant optimism of the rationalist tradition of evidence scholarship. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T18:17:03Z |
| format | Article |
| id | nottingham-2078 |
| institution | University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T18:17:03Z |
| publishDate | 2003 |
| publisher | Quinnipiac University School of Law |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | nottingham-20782020-05-04T20:32:04Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/2078/ Modern trends in evidence scholarship: is all rosy in the garden? Jackson, John This article reviews the state of evidence scholarship in the early 21st century and argues that it has been enriched by drawing upon a range of different disciplines including social psychology,cognitive science, forensic psychology, mathematics, linguistics and economics. It argues for the relevance of sociological, historical and comparative approaches as a useful corrective aganst the dominant optimism of the rationalist tradition of evidence scholarship. Quinnipiac University School of Law 2003 Article PeerReviewed Jackson, John (2003) Modern trends in evidence scholarship: is all rosy in the garden? Quinnipiac Law Review, 21 (4). pp. 893-906. ISSN 1073-8606 |
| spellingShingle | Jackson, John Modern trends in evidence scholarship: is all rosy in the garden? |
| title | Modern trends in evidence scholarship: is all rosy in the garden? |
| title_full | Modern trends in evidence scholarship: is all rosy in the garden? |
| title_fullStr | Modern trends in evidence scholarship: is all rosy in the garden? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Modern trends in evidence scholarship: is all rosy in the garden? |
| title_short | Modern trends in evidence scholarship: is all rosy in the garden? |
| title_sort | modern trends in evidence scholarship: is all rosy in the garden? |
| url | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/2078/ |