Ambivalent improvements: biography, biopolitics, and colonial Delhi

This paper explores the ambivalent feelings towards the Government of India produced in one of the government’s own employees. In establishing the Delhi Improvement Trust in the 1930s, Arthur Parke Hume had to battle against governmental cost cutting in an attempt to secure the rehousing of slum evi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stephen, Legg
Format: Article
Published: Pion 2008
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/1873/
_version_ 1848790678202482688
author Stephen, Legg
author_facet Stephen, Legg
author_sort Stephen, Legg
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description This paper explores the ambivalent feelings towards the Government of India produced in one of the government’s own employees. In establishing the Delhi Improvement Trust in the 1930s, Arthur Parke Hume had to battle against governmental cost cutting in an attempt to secure the rehousing of slum evictees. The refusal of the government to accept this welfarist commitment to investment led to the stalling of the improvement projects and great emotional disquiet for Hume. This is traced through his personal correspondence with his parents. In interweaving these insights with the imperial archive, three biographical approaches are adopted. A traditional chronology is used to order the events, an analytical approach is used to outline the discursive regularities of Hume’s observations, and a genealogical approach is used to suggest the influences on Hume’s writings and the broader governmental rationalities that he had to negotiate.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:16:26Z
format Article
id nottingham-1873
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:16:26Z
publishDate 2008
publisher Pion
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-18732020-05-04T20:27:57Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/1873/ Ambivalent improvements: biography, biopolitics, and colonial Delhi Stephen, Legg This paper explores the ambivalent feelings towards the Government of India produced in one of the government’s own employees. In establishing the Delhi Improvement Trust in the 1930s, Arthur Parke Hume had to battle against governmental cost cutting in an attempt to secure the rehousing of slum evictees. The refusal of the government to accept this welfarist commitment to investment led to the stalling of the improvement projects and great emotional disquiet for Hume. This is traced through his personal correspondence with his parents. In interweaving these insights with the imperial archive, three biographical approaches are adopted. A traditional chronology is used to order the events, an analytical approach is used to outline the discursive regularities of Hume’s observations, and a genealogical approach is used to suggest the influences on Hume’s writings and the broader governmental rationalities that he had to negotiate. Pion 2008 Article PeerReviewed Stephen, Legg (2008) Ambivalent improvements: biography, biopolitics, and colonial Delhi. Environment and Planning A, 40 (1). pp. 37-56. ISSN 0308-518X http://www.envplan.com/abstract.cgi?id=a38460 doi:10.1068/a38460 doi:10.1068/a38460
spellingShingle Stephen, Legg
Ambivalent improvements: biography, biopolitics, and colonial Delhi
title Ambivalent improvements: biography, biopolitics, and colonial Delhi
title_full Ambivalent improvements: biography, biopolitics, and colonial Delhi
title_fullStr Ambivalent improvements: biography, biopolitics, and colonial Delhi
title_full_unstemmed Ambivalent improvements: biography, biopolitics, and colonial Delhi
title_short Ambivalent improvements: biography, biopolitics, and colonial Delhi
title_sort ambivalent improvements: biography, biopolitics, and colonial delhi
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/1873/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/1873/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/1873/