Re-thinking Herczegfalvy: the ECHR and the control of psychiatric treatment

This chapter forms part of a E Brems (ed.), Diversity and Human Rights: Rewriting Judgments of the ECHR (Cambridge: CUP, forthcoming 2013), in which lawyers and academics re-write judgments of the ECHR in a number of human rights areas. This chapter looks at the case of Herzcegfalvy v Austria,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bartlett, Peter
Other Authors: Brems, Eva
Format: Book Section
Published: Cambridge University Press 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/1765/
_version_ 1848790671226306560
author Bartlett, Peter
author2 Brems, Eva
author_facet Brems, Eva
Bartlett, Peter
author_sort Bartlett, Peter
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description This chapter forms part of a E Brems (ed.), Diversity and Human Rights: Rewriting Judgments of the ECHR (Cambridge: CUP, forthcoming 2013), in which lawyers and academics re-write judgments of the ECHR in a number of human rights areas. This chapter looks at the case of Herzcegfalvy v Austria, which establishes the framework for the ECHR's consideration of involuntary psychiatric treatment. It argues that consistent with developments in international law and disability rights, much stronger justifications for involuntary treatment should be required (if indeed involuntary treatment is to be permitted at all).
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:16:19Z
format Book Section
id nottingham-1765
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:16:19Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Cambridge University Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-17652020-05-04T16:34:12Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/1765/ Re-thinking Herczegfalvy: the ECHR and the control of psychiatric treatment Bartlett, Peter This chapter forms part of a E Brems (ed.), Diversity and Human Rights: Rewriting Judgments of the ECHR (Cambridge: CUP, forthcoming 2013), in which lawyers and academics re-write judgments of the ECHR in a number of human rights areas. This chapter looks at the case of Herzcegfalvy v Austria, which establishes the framework for the ECHR's consideration of involuntary psychiatric treatment. It argues that consistent with developments in international law and disability rights, much stronger justifications for involuntary treatment should be required (if indeed involuntary treatment is to be permitted at all). Cambridge University Press Brems, Eva 2012-11-01 Book Section NonPeerReviewed Bartlett, Peter (2012) Re-thinking Herczegfalvy: the ECHR and the control of psychiatric treatment. In: Diversity and human rights: rewriting judgments of the ECHR. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 352-381. ISBN 9781107026605 compulsory psychiatric treatment Herzcegfalvy http://www.cambridge.org/gb/knowledge/isbn/item6891363/?site_locale=en_GB
spellingShingle compulsory psychiatric treatment Herzcegfalvy
Bartlett, Peter
Re-thinking Herczegfalvy: the ECHR and the control of psychiatric treatment
title Re-thinking Herczegfalvy: the ECHR and the control of psychiatric treatment
title_full Re-thinking Herczegfalvy: the ECHR and the control of psychiatric treatment
title_fullStr Re-thinking Herczegfalvy: the ECHR and the control of psychiatric treatment
title_full_unstemmed Re-thinking Herczegfalvy: the ECHR and the control of psychiatric treatment
title_short Re-thinking Herczegfalvy: the ECHR and the control of psychiatric treatment
title_sort re-thinking herczegfalvy: the echr and the control of psychiatric treatment
topic compulsory psychiatric treatment Herzcegfalvy
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/1765/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/1765/