The moral belief problem

The moral belief problem is that of reconciling expressivism in ethics with both minimalism in the philosophy of language and the syntactic discipline of moral sentences. It is argued that the problem can be solved by distinguishing minimal and robust senses of belief, where a minimal belief is any...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sinclair, Neil
Format: Article
Published: Blackwell 2006
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/1528/
_version_ 1848790624004734976
author Sinclair, Neil
author_facet Sinclair, Neil
author_sort Sinclair, Neil
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description The moral belief problem is that of reconciling expressivism in ethics with both minimalism in the philosophy of language and the syntactic discipline of moral sentences. It is argued that the problem can be solved by distinguishing minimal and robust senses of belief, where a minimal belief is any state of mind expressed by sincere assertoric use of a syntactically disciplined sentence and a robust belief is a minimal belief with some additional property R. Two attempts to specify R are discussed, both based on the thought that beliefs are states that aim at truth. According to the first, robust beliefs are criticisable to the extent that their content fails to match the state of the world. This sense fails to distinguish robust beliefs from minimal beliefs. According to the second, robust beliefs function to have their content match the state of the world. This sense succeeds in distinguishing robust beliefs from minimal beliefs. The conclusion is that the debate concerning the cognitive status of moral convictions needs to address the issue of the function of moral convictions. Evolutionary theorising may be relevant, but will not be decisive, to answering this question.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:15:34Z
format Article
id nottingham-1528
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:15:34Z
publishDate 2006
publisher Blackwell
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-15282020-05-04T20:30:16Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/1528/ The moral belief problem Sinclair, Neil The moral belief problem is that of reconciling expressivism in ethics with both minimalism in the philosophy of language and the syntactic discipline of moral sentences. It is argued that the problem can be solved by distinguishing minimal and robust senses of belief, where a minimal belief is any state of mind expressed by sincere assertoric use of a syntactically disciplined sentence and a robust belief is a minimal belief with some additional property R. Two attempts to specify R are discussed, both based on the thought that beliefs are states that aim at truth. According to the first, robust beliefs are criticisable to the extent that their content fails to match the state of the world. This sense fails to distinguish robust beliefs from minimal beliefs. According to the second, robust beliefs function to have their content match the state of the world. This sense succeeds in distinguishing robust beliefs from minimal beliefs. The conclusion is that the debate concerning the cognitive status of moral convictions needs to address the issue of the function of moral convictions. Evolutionary theorising may be relevant, but will not be decisive, to answering this question. Blackwell 2006 Article PeerReviewed Sinclair, Neil (2006) The moral belief problem. Ratio, 19 (2). pp. 249-260. ISSN 1467-9329 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9329.2006.00323.x/abstract doi:10.1111/j.1467-9329.2006.00323.x doi:10.1111/j.1467-9329.2006.00323.x
spellingShingle Sinclair, Neil
The moral belief problem
title The moral belief problem
title_full The moral belief problem
title_fullStr The moral belief problem
title_full_unstemmed The moral belief problem
title_short The moral belief problem
title_sort moral belief problem
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/1528/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/1528/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/1528/