Stabilisation clauses and sustainable development in developing countries
This thesis examines the rationale and on-going purpose of stabilisation clauses and the ways in which the clauses undermine the pursuit of sustainable development in developing countries. Two presumptions prevail in the literature on stabilisation clauses. The first is that developing countr...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis (University of Nottingham only) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/14466/ |
| _version_ | 1848791967855542272 |
|---|---|
| author | Frank, Sotonye |
| author_facet | Frank, Sotonye |
| author_sort | Frank, Sotonye |
| building | Nottingham Research Data Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | This thesis examines the rationale and on-going purpose of stabilisation clauses and the ways in which the clauses undermine the pursuit of sustainable development in developing countries.
Two presumptions prevail in the literature on stabilisation clauses. The first is that developing countries compete for foreign investment on the basis of political risks. The second is that there are higher levels of political risks in developing countries. This thesis argues that neither presumption is true as such. The available evidence points to a more intense competition among foreign investors backed by their home governments for access to the extractive resources in developing countries. The political risks that stabilisation clauses are aimed at also exist, at least in equal measure, in developed countries. Nevertheless, stabilisation clauses are routinely recommended to developing countries as an ‘essential’ feature of an attractive investment climate. This recommendation is, however, not supported by any reliable evidence pointing to a link between stabilisation clauses and foreign investment inflow.
The literature on the potential adverse impacts of stabilisation clauses has evolved in a compartmentalised way, focusing on their impact on the ability of host governments to enact environmental and/or human rights laws. This approach and focus are misplaced because in practice, stabilisation clauses rarely limit the ability of host governments to enact human rights and environmental laws. Rather, they limit their ability to alter their fiscal and economic laws and policies in other to integrate such laws and policies with their social and environmental objectives. The main implication of this limitation is that such governments are unable to mobilise the maximum of available funds to finance their sustainable development measures including those specifically directed at eradicating poverty, improving human rights standards and protecting the environment. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T18:36:56Z |
| format | Thesis (University of Nottingham only) |
| id | nottingham-14466 |
| institution | University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T18:36:56Z |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | nottingham-144662025-02-28T11:31:02Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/14466/ Stabilisation clauses and sustainable development in developing countries Frank, Sotonye This thesis examines the rationale and on-going purpose of stabilisation clauses and the ways in which the clauses undermine the pursuit of sustainable development in developing countries. Two presumptions prevail in the literature on stabilisation clauses. The first is that developing countries compete for foreign investment on the basis of political risks. The second is that there are higher levels of political risks in developing countries. This thesis argues that neither presumption is true as such. The available evidence points to a more intense competition among foreign investors backed by their home governments for access to the extractive resources in developing countries. The political risks that stabilisation clauses are aimed at also exist, at least in equal measure, in developed countries. Nevertheless, stabilisation clauses are routinely recommended to developing countries as an ‘essential’ feature of an attractive investment climate. This recommendation is, however, not supported by any reliable evidence pointing to a link between stabilisation clauses and foreign investment inflow. The literature on the potential adverse impacts of stabilisation clauses has evolved in a compartmentalised way, focusing on their impact on the ability of host governments to enact environmental and/or human rights laws. This approach and focus are misplaced because in practice, stabilisation clauses rarely limit the ability of host governments to enact human rights and environmental laws. Rather, they limit their ability to alter their fiscal and economic laws and policies in other to integrate such laws and policies with their social and environmental objectives. The main implication of this limitation is that such governments are unable to mobilise the maximum of available funds to finance their sustainable development measures including those specifically directed at eradicating poverty, improving human rights standards and protecting the environment. 2014-07-16 Thesis (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en arr https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/14466/1/PhD_Thesis.pdf Frank, Sotonye (2014) Stabilisation clauses and sustainable development in developing countries. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. Stabilisation Clauses; Foreign Direct Investment; Sustainable Development; Developing Countries; Investment Contracts |
| spellingShingle | Stabilisation Clauses; Foreign Direct Investment; Sustainable Development; Developing Countries; Investment Contracts Frank, Sotonye Stabilisation clauses and sustainable development in developing countries |
| title | Stabilisation clauses and sustainable development in developing countries |
| title_full | Stabilisation clauses and sustainable development in developing countries |
| title_fullStr | Stabilisation clauses and sustainable development in developing countries |
| title_full_unstemmed | Stabilisation clauses and sustainable development in developing countries |
| title_short | Stabilisation clauses and sustainable development in developing countries |
| title_sort | stabilisation clauses and sustainable development in developing countries |
| topic | Stabilisation Clauses; Foreign Direct Investment; Sustainable Development; Developing Countries; Investment Contracts |
| url | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/14466/ |