Feminism and the university: the roles of disciplinary field and educational habitus in the lives and works of two feminist intellectuals
This thesis is an exploration of the production of feminist theory as a material, social, and institutional practice: it aims to understand feminist intellectual production as to some extent circumscribed by historical, biographical, political, and especially academic conditions. Specifically, it co...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis (University of Nottingham only) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/13711/ |
| _version_ | 1848791792537829376 |
|---|---|
| author | Telling, Kathryn |
| author_facet | Telling, Kathryn |
| author_sort | Telling, Kathryn |
| building | Nottingham Research Data Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | This thesis is an exploration of the production of feminist theory as a material, social, and institutional practice: it aims to understand feminist intellectual production as to some extent circumscribed by historical, biographical, political, and especially academic conditions. Specifically, it compares the intellectual trajectories and scholarly output, feminist and otherwise, of theologian Mary Daly (1928-2010) and philosopher Judith Butler (1956--). The analysis tries to keep three aspects of those lives in mind at once: firstly, the properly intellectual character of the intellectuals’ ideas; secondly, the specifically institutional (that is, university) conditions in which they have found themselves; and thirdly, the broader biographical conditions of their lives. By keeping all three in mind at once, we get to a potentially fuller and more nuanced picture of their intellectual trajectories than may be available through critical appraisal of their works alone. The thesis is an original contribution to knowledge both in as much as it brings together Daly and Butler, two apparently fundamentally opposed feminists, in order to see what thinking them together allows us to do, and in the applications and adaptations of Pierre Bourdieu’s social theory which help explain these feminists’ trajectories.
Through a re-working of Bourdieu’s theoretical apparatus, the analysis works through the concept of fields of intellectual endeavour. Academic disciplines but also broader structures such as the field of intellectual production work with and against intellectual producers, creating both possibilities and constraints for intellectual work. Developing a broadly Bourdieusian theory of symbiotic relations between what Bourdieu terms habitus and field (that is, trying to identify the mutual constitution of these aspects of social life rather than the primacy of either), the thesis argues for the fundamental role of agential negotiation and strategy in the context of institutional and disciplinary constraint. And in the context of this adapted Bourdieusian theory, I argue finally for the disciplinary field of women’s studies as a potentially fruitful institutional and intellectual space for a feminist negotiation of the university. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T18:34:08Z |
| format | Thesis (University of Nottingham only) |
| id | nottingham-13711 |
| institution | University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T18:34:08Z |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | nottingham-137112025-02-28T11:26:41Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/13711/ Feminism and the university: the roles of disciplinary field and educational habitus in the lives and works of two feminist intellectuals Telling, Kathryn This thesis is an exploration of the production of feminist theory as a material, social, and institutional practice: it aims to understand feminist intellectual production as to some extent circumscribed by historical, biographical, political, and especially academic conditions. Specifically, it compares the intellectual trajectories and scholarly output, feminist and otherwise, of theologian Mary Daly (1928-2010) and philosopher Judith Butler (1956--). The analysis tries to keep three aspects of those lives in mind at once: firstly, the properly intellectual character of the intellectuals’ ideas; secondly, the specifically institutional (that is, university) conditions in which they have found themselves; and thirdly, the broader biographical conditions of their lives. By keeping all three in mind at once, we get to a potentially fuller and more nuanced picture of their intellectual trajectories than may be available through critical appraisal of their works alone. The thesis is an original contribution to knowledge both in as much as it brings together Daly and Butler, two apparently fundamentally opposed feminists, in order to see what thinking them together allows us to do, and in the applications and adaptations of Pierre Bourdieu’s social theory which help explain these feminists’ trajectories. Through a re-working of Bourdieu’s theoretical apparatus, the analysis works through the concept of fields of intellectual endeavour. Academic disciplines but also broader structures such as the field of intellectual production work with and against intellectual producers, creating both possibilities and constraints for intellectual work. Developing a broadly Bourdieusian theory of symbiotic relations between what Bourdieu terms habitus and field (that is, trying to identify the mutual constitution of these aspects of social life rather than the primacy of either), the thesis argues for the fundamental role of agential negotiation and strategy in the context of institutional and disciplinary constraint. And in the context of this adapted Bourdieusian theory, I argue finally for the disciplinary field of women’s studies as a potentially fruitful institutional and intellectual space for a feminist negotiation of the university. 2013 Thesis (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en arr https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/13711/1/Telling%2C_%27Feminism_and_the_University%27.pdf Telling, Kathryn (2013) Feminism and the university: the roles of disciplinary field and educational habitus in the lives and works of two feminist intellectuals. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. Feminist Theory Universities Disciplines Mary Daly Judith Butler Pierre Bourdieu |
| spellingShingle | Feminist Theory Universities Disciplines Mary Daly Judith Butler Pierre Bourdieu Telling, Kathryn Feminism and the university: the roles of disciplinary field and educational habitus in the lives and works of two feminist intellectuals |
| title | Feminism and the university: the roles of disciplinary field and educational habitus in the lives and works of two feminist intellectuals |
| title_full | Feminism and the university: the roles of disciplinary field and educational habitus in the lives and works of two feminist intellectuals |
| title_fullStr | Feminism and the university: the roles of disciplinary field and educational habitus in the lives and works of two feminist intellectuals |
| title_full_unstemmed | Feminism and the university: the roles of disciplinary field and educational habitus in the lives and works of two feminist intellectuals |
| title_short | Feminism and the university: the roles of disciplinary field and educational habitus in the lives and works of two feminist intellectuals |
| title_sort | feminism and the university: the roles of disciplinary field and educational habitus in the lives and works of two feminist intellectuals |
| topic | Feminist Theory Universities Disciplines Mary Daly Judith Butler Pierre Bourdieu |
| url | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/13711/ |