'Climategate': paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis

Climate scepticism in the sense of climate denialism or contrarianism is not a new phenomenon, but it has recently been very much in the media spotlight. When, in November 2009, emails by climate scientists were published on the internet without their authors’ consent, a debate began in which climat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nerlich, Brigitte
Format: Article
Published: White Horse Press 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/1371/
_version_ 1848790594098298880
author Nerlich, Brigitte
author_facet Nerlich, Brigitte
author_sort Nerlich, Brigitte
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Climate scepticism in the sense of climate denialism or contrarianism is not a new phenomenon, but it has recently been very much in the media spotlight. When, in November 2009, emails by climate scientists were published on the internet without their authors’ consent, a debate began in which climate sceptic bloggers used an extended network of metaphors to contest (climate) science. This article follows the so-called ‘climategate’ debate on the web and shows how a paradoxical mixture of religious metaphors and demands for ‘better science’ allowed those disagreeing with the theory of anthropogenic climate change to undermine the authority of science and call for political inaction with regard to climate change.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:15:05Z
format Article
id nottingham-1371
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:15:05Z
publishDate 2010
publisher White Horse Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-13712020-05-04T20:25:43Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/1371/ 'Climategate': paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis Nerlich, Brigitte Climate scepticism in the sense of climate denialism or contrarianism is not a new phenomenon, but it has recently been very much in the media spotlight. When, in November 2009, emails by climate scientists were published on the internet without their authors’ consent, a debate began in which climate sceptic bloggers used an extended network of metaphors to contest (climate) science. This article follows the so-called ‘climategate’ debate on the web and shows how a paradoxical mixture of religious metaphors and demands for ‘better science’ allowed those disagreeing with the theory of anthropogenic climate change to undermine the authority of science and call for political inaction with regard to climate change. White Horse Press 2010 Article PeerReviewed Nerlich, Brigitte (2010) 'Climategate': paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis. Environmental Values, 14 (9). pp. 419-442. ISSN 0963-2719 (print) 1752-7015 (online). Climate scepticism climate science policy metaphor framing religion http://www.erica.demon.co.uk/EV/EV1919.html 10.3197/096327110X531543 10.3197/096327110X531543 10.3197/096327110X531543
spellingShingle Climate scepticism
climate science
policy
metaphor
framing
religion
Nerlich, Brigitte
'Climategate': paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis
title 'Climategate': paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis
title_full 'Climategate': paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis
title_fullStr 'Climategate': paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis
title_full_unstemmed 'Climategate': paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis
title_short 'Climategate': paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis
title_sort 'climategate': paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis
topic Climate scepticism
climate science
policy
metaphor
framing
religion
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/1371/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/1371/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/1371/