On the obligation to be rational

I formulate what I believe to be a correct account of the normativity of rationality. I identify two opposing doctrines which I call instrumentalism and rationalism. Instrumentalism says there are no obligations to be rational intrinsic to rationality, but that being rational is instrumental to doin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shackel, Nicholas
Format: Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2004
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12984/
_version_ 1848791623342751744
author Shackel, Nicholas
author_facet Shackel, Nicholas
author_sort Shackel, Nicholas
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description I formulate what I believe to be a correct account of the normativity of rationality. I identify two opposing doctrines which I call instrumentalism and rationalism. Instrumentalism says there are no obligations to be rational intrinsic to rationality, but that being rational is instrumental to doing what ought to be done. Rationalism says there are intrinsically rational obligations. I give arguments for instrumentalism and show how a bifurcation in normativity undermines characteristic Aristotelian and Kantian arguments in support of rationalism. I concede that the confrontation between instrumentalism and rationalism cannot be settled in the thesis, since it depends in part on a fundamental dispute about the nature of rationality. However, the doctrine of instrumentalism gives a particularly clear picture of how obligation and rationality are related, and I believe I have shown instrumentalism to be a doctrine which must be taken seriously. Consequently, I believe my thesis to be a contribution to the Humean view of the relation of obligation and reason.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:31:27Z
format Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-12984
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:31:27Z
publishDate 2004
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-129842025-02-28T11:22:28Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12984/ On the obligation to be rational Shackel, Nicholas I formulate what I believe to be a correct account of the normativity of rationality. I identify two opposing doctrines which I call instrumentalism and rationalism. Instrumentalism says there are no obligations to be rational intrinsic to rationality, but that being rational is instrumental to doing what ought to be done. Rationalism says there are intrinsically rational obligations. I give arguments for instrumentalism and show how a bifurcation in normativity undermines characteristic Aristotelian and Kantian arguments in support of rationalism. I concede that the confrontation between instrumentalism and rationalism cannot be settled in the thesis, since it depends in part on a fundamental dispute about the nature of rationality. However, the doctrine of instrumentalism gives a particularly clear picture of how obligation and rationality are related, and I believe I have shown instrumentalism to be a doctrine which must be taken seriously. Consequently, I believe my thesis to be a contribution to the Humean view of the relation of obligation and reason. 2004 Thesis (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en arr https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12984/1/403508.pdf Shackel, Nicholas (2004) On the obligation to be rational. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.
spellingShingle Shackel, Nicholas
On the obligation to be rational
title On the obligation to be rational
title_full On the obligation to be rational
title_fullStr On the obligation to be rational
title_full_unstemmed On the obligation to be rational
title_short On the obligation to be rational
title_sort on the obligation to be rational
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12984/