Citizens' perceptions of standards in public life

This thesis analyses citizens' perceptions of standards in public life. It attempts to understand whether perceptions such as these are important substantively for questions of citizen disaffection, and begins the task of analyzing how citizens come to hold the perceptions they do. The thesis p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rose, Jonathan
Format: Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12575/
_version_ 1848791529639903232
author Rose, Jonathan
author_facet Rose, Jonathan
author_sort Rose, Jonathan
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description This thesis analyses citizens' perceptions of standards in public life. It attempts to understand whether perceptions such as these are important substantively for questions of citizen disaffection, and begins the task of analyzing how citizens come to hold the perceptions they do. The thesis presents a systematic investigation into this topic, placing perceived standards in the context of a discussion about citizen disaffection and the perceived legitimacy of political systems. As they are conceived of in this thesis, 'standards in public life' can usefully be thought of as the 'rules of the game' or the 'spirit of public service'. Standards in public life are less a set of formal, prescriptive rules, more an exhortation to the appropriate exercise of public office. Such a focus upon the 'rules of the game' results in the primary concern of this thesis being about the process of governing, as opposed to the outcomes governors can produce. The thesis investigates perceptions of standards in two parts. Part 1 considers broad questions of the conceptualisation, measurement and structure of citizen beliefs about government in general, and perceptions of standards in particular. The findings of Part 1 therefore provide a base upon which future analyses can be built. Part 2 investigates the causes of perceptions of standards, focusing upon three aspects of political ‘conditions’: partisan co-alignment, the ‘scandal’ concerning Derek Conway’s use of parliamentary expenses to employ his son to do essentially no work, and the MPs’ expenses scandal. The analyses in this thesis are primarily quantitative, and investigate a series of four datasets, which contain data collected in the United Kingdom between 2003 and 2011.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:29:58Z
format Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-12575
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:29:58Z
publishDate 2012
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-125752025-02-28T11:20:03Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12575/ Citizens' perceptions of standards in public life Rose, Jonathan This thesis analyses citizens' perceptions of standards in public life. It attempts to understand whether perceptions such as these are important substantively for questions of citizen disaffection, and begins the task of analyzing how citizens come to hold the perceptions they do. The thesis presents a systematic investigation into this topic, placing perceived standards in the context of a discussion about citizen disaffection and the perceived legitimacy of political systems. As they are conceived of in this thesis, 'standards in public life' can usefully be thought of as the 'rules of the game' or the 'spirit of public service'. Standards in public life are less a set of formal, prescriptive rules, more an exhortation to the appropriate exercise of public office. Such a focus upon the 'rules of the game' results in the primary concern of this thesis being about the process of governing, as opposed to the outcomes governors can produce. The thesis investigates perceptions of standards in two parts. Part 1 considers broad questions of the conceptualisation, measurement and structure of citizen beliefs about government in general, and perceptions of standards in particular. The findings of Part 1 therefore provide a base upon which future analyses can be built. Part 2 investigates the causes of perceptions of standards, focusing upon three aspects of political ‘conditions’: partisan co-alignment, the ‘scandal’ concerning Derek Conway’s use of parliamentary expenses to employ his son to do essentially no work, and the MPs’ expenses scandal. The analyses in this thesis are primarily quantitative, and investigate a series of four datasets, which contain data collected in the United Kingdom between 2003 and 2011. 2012-07-20 Thesis (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en arr https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12575/1/J_Rose_PhD_thesis.pdf Rose, Jonathan (2012) Citizens' perceptions of standards in public life. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. Political Trust Public Ethics Standards in Public Life
spellingShingle Political Trust
Public Ethics
Standards in Public Life
Rose, Jonathan
Citizens' perceptions of standards in public life
title Citizens' perceptions of standards in public life
title_full Citizens' perceptions of standards in public life
title_fullStr Citizens' perceptions of standards in public life
title_full_unstemmed Citizens' perceptions of standards in public life
title_short Citizens' perceptions of standards in public life
title_sort citizens' perceptions of standards in public life
topic Political Trust
Public Ethics
Standards in Public Life
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12575/