Arguing for a citizens basic income: a contribution from a feminist economics perspective

Current debates concerning the future of social security provision in advanced capitalist states have raised a citizens‟ basic income (CBI) as a possible reform package. The proposal is based on the principles of individuality, universality and unconditionality and ensures a minimum income guarantee...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McKay, Ailsa
Format: Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12283/
_version_ 1848791469169573888
author McKay, Ailsa
author_facet McKay, Ailsa
author_sort McKay, Ailsa
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Current debates concerning the future of social security provision in advanced capitalist states have raised a citizens‟ basic income (CBI) as a possible reform package. The proposal is based on the principles of individuality, universality and unconditionality and ensures a minimum income guarantee for all members of society. Implementing a CBI, thus, entails radical reform of existing patterns of welfare delivery and would bring into question the institutionalized relationship between work and welfare, upon which modern welfare states are premised. It follows that the practice of arguing for a CBI has tended to concentrate on issues regarding the role of the state in providing income security for all citizens and, in particular, to issues pertaining to the world of paid work. However such a concentration indicates bias in the approach to study and serves to confine the welfare reform agenda. The purpose of this thesis is to make a positive contribution to the CBI literature by examining the proposal from a feminist economics perspective. It is argued that a CBI has the potential to promote equal rights of freedom for men and women and provides the basis for the development and sustainability of new and liberating patterns of working and living. However, this particular aspect of the proposal will never be fully considered as long as the analytical framework employed is dominated by an adherence to neo-classical economic theory. Embracing a feminist economics perspective allows for the identification of the androcentric bias inherent within the neo-classical construct and further provides an alternative methodological approach that serves to open up the debate to incorporate a more realistic vision of the nature of modern socio-economic relationships.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:29:00Z
format Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-12283
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:29:00Z
publishDate 2000
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-122832025-02-28T11:18:28Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12283/ Arguing for a citizens basic income: a contribution from a feminist economics perspective McKay, Ailsa Current debates concerning the future of social security provision in advanced capitalist states have raised a citizens‟ basic income (CBI) as a possible reform package. The proposal is based on the principles of individuality, universality and unconditionality and ensures a minimum income guarantee for all members of society. Implementing a CBI, thus, entails radical reform of existing patterns of welfare delivery and would bring into question the institutionalized relationship between work and welfare, upon which modern welfare states are premised. It follows that the practice of arguing for a CBI has tended to concentrate on issues regarding the role of the state in providing income security for all citizens and, in particular, to issues pertaining to the world of paid work. However such a concentration indicates bias in the approach to study and serves to confine the welfare reform agenda. The purpose of this thesis is to make a positive contribution to the CBI literature by examining the proposal from a feminist economics perspective. It is argued that a CBI has the potential to promote equal rights of freedom for men and women and provides the basis for the development and sustainability of new and liberating patterns of working and living. However, this particular aspect of the proposal will never be fully considered as long as the analytical framework employed is dominated by an adherence to neo-classical economic theory. Embracing a feminist economics perspective allows for the identification of the androcentric bias inherent within the neo-classical construct and further provides an alternative methodological approach that serves to open up the debate to incorporate a more realistic vision of the nature of modern socio-economic relationships. 2000-12-15 Thesis (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en arr https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12283/1/326651.pdf McKay, Ailsa (2000) Arguing for a citizens basic income: a contribution from a feminist economics perspective. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. basic income guaranteed income feminist economics
spellingShingle basic income
guaranteed income
feminist economics
McKay, Ailsa
Arguing for a citizens basic income: a contribution from a feminist economics perspective
title Arguing for a citizens basic income: a contribution from a feminist economics perspective
title_full Arguing for a citizens basic income: a contribution from a feminist economics perspective
title_fullStr Arguing for a citizens basic income: a contribution from a feminist economics perspective
title_full_unstemmed Arguing for a citizens basic income: a contribution from a feminist economics perspective
title_short Arguing for a citizens basic income: a contribution from a feminist economics perspective
title_sort arguing for a citizens basic income: a contribution from a feminist economics perspective
topic basic income
guaranteed income
feminist economics
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12283/