In vivo models of lung neutrophil activation. Comparison of mice and hamsters

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that both the migration and activation of neutrophils into the airway is of importance in pathological conditions such as pulmonary emphysema. In the present study, we describe in vivo models of lung neutrophil infiltration and activation in mice and hamsters. RESULTS:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Corteling, R., Wyss, D., Trifilieff, A.
Format: Article
Published: 2002
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/121/
_version_ 1848790345529163776
author Corteling, R.
Wyss, D.
Trifilieff, A.
author_facet Corteling, R.
Wyss, D.
Trifilieff, A.
author_sort Corteling, R.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that both the migration and activation of neutrophils into the airway is of importance in pathological conditions such as pulmonary emphysema. In the present study, we describe in vivo models of lung neutrophil infiltration and activation in mice and hamsters. RESULTS: BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice were intranasally treated with lipopolysaccharide (0.3 mg/kg). Twenty-four hours after, animals were treated intranasally with N-Formyl-Met-Leu-Phe (0 to 5 mg/kg). Golden Syrian hamsters were treated intratracheally with 0.5 mg/kg of lipopolysaccharide. Twenty-four hours after, animals were treated intratracheally with 0.25 mg/kg of N-Formyl-Met-Leu-Phe. Both mice and hamster were sacrificed two hours after the N-Formyl-Met-Leu-Phe application. In both BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice, a neutrophil infiltration was observed after the sequential application of lipopolysaccharide and N-Formyl-Met-Leu-Phe. However, 5 times less neutrophil was found in C57BL/6 mice when compared to BALB/c mice. This was reflected in the neutrophil activation parameters measured (myeloperoxidase and elastase activities). Despite the presence of neutrophil and their activation status, no lung haemorrhage could be detected in both strains of mice. When compared with mice, the lung inflammation induced by the sequential application of lipopolysaccharide and N-Formyl-Met-Leu-Phe was much greater in the hamster. In parallel with this lung inflammation, a significant lung haemorrhage was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: Both mouse and hamster can be used for pharmacological studies of new drugs or other therapeutics agents that aimed to interfere with neutrophil activation. However, only the hamster model seems to be suitable for studying the haemorrhagic lung injury process
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:11:08Z
format Article
id nottingham-121
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:11:08Z
publishDate 2002
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-1212020-05-04T20:32:21Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/121/ In vivo models of lung neutrophil activation. Comparison of mice and hamsters Corteling, R. Wyss, D. Trifilieff, A. BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that both the migration and activation of neutrophils into the airway is of importance in pathological conditions such as pulmonary emphysema. In the present study, we describe in vivo models of lung neutrophil infiltration and activation in mice and hamsters. RESULTS: BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice were intranasally treated with lipopolysaccharide (0.3 mg/kg). Twenty-four hours after, animals were treated intranasally with N-Formyl-Met-Leu-Phe (0 to 5 mg/kg). Golden Syrian hamsters were treated intratracheally with 0.5 mg/kg of lipopolysaccharide. Twenty-four hours after, animals were treated intratracheally with 0.25 mg/kg of N-Formyl-Met-Leu-Phe. Both mice and hamster were sacrificed two hours after the N-Formyl-Met-Leu-Phe application. In both BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice, a neutrophil infiltration was observed after the sequential application of lipopolysaccharide and N-Formyl-Met-Leu-Phe. However, 5 times less neutrophil was found in C57BL/6 mice when compared to BALB/c mice. This was reflected in the neutrophil activation parameters measured (myeloperoxidase and elastase activities). Despite the presence of neutrophil and their activation status, no lung haemorrhage could be detected in both strains of mice. When compared with mice, the lung inflammation induced by the sequential application of lipopolysaccharide and N-Formyl-Met-Leu-Phe was much greater in the hamster. In parallel with this lung inflammation, a significant lung haemorrhage was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: Both mouse and hamster can be used for pharmacological studies of new drugs or other therapeutics agents that aimed to interfere with neutrophil activation. However, only the hamster model seems to be suitable for studying the haemorrhagic lung injury process 2002 Article PeerReviewed Corteling, R., Wyss, D. and Trifilieff, A. (2002) In vivo models of lung neutrophil activation. Comparison of mice and hamsters. BMC Pharmacology, 2 (1). p. 1.
spellingShingle Corteling, R.
Wyss, D.
Trifilieff, A.
In vivo models of lung neutrophil activation. Comparison of mice and hamsters
title In vivo models of lung neutrophil activation. Comparison of mice and hamsters
title_full In vivo models of lung neutrophil activation. Comparison of mice and hamsters
title_fullStr In vivo models of lung neutrophil activation. Comparison of mice and hamsters
title_full_unstemmed In vivo models of lung neutrophil activation. Comparison of mice and hamsters
title_short In vivo models of lung neutrophil activation. Comparison of mice and hamsters
title_sort in vivo models of lung neutrophil activation. comparison of mice and hamsters
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/121/