D.H. Lawrence: Lawrentian politics and ideology

This thesis aims to provide a critical re-evaluation of politics and ideology in the work of D.H. Lawrence. The thesis brings a number of authors (including the Marquis de Sade, Robert Louis Stevenson, H. G. Wells and Raymond Chandler) into dialogue with Lawrence - fIrstly in order to interrogate La...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Skelton, Philip
Format: Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/11962/
_version_ 1848791399684636672
author Skelton, Philip
author_facet Skelton, Philip
author_sort Skelton, Philip
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description This thesis aims to provide a critical re-evaluation of politics and ideology in the work of D.H. Lawrence. The thesis brings a number of authors (including the Marquis de Sade, Robert Louis Stevenson, H. G. Wells and Raymond Chandler) into dialogue with Lawrence - fIrstly in order to interrogate Lawrentian assumptions, but also to relocate a writer often seen as being eccentric to literary circles and to society generally. My Introduction surveys two broad schools of Lawrence criticism: first, the 'Lawrentian' kind, which inspects Lawrence's fiction through an often uncritical appreciation of the non-fictional writings - his 'philosophy' - and consequently is often reduced to an echo of the primary material. While recognising, in the manner of my second, socialist school of criticism, Lawrence's philosophy as ideology, a challenge is also made to the conventional left-wing judgement that such ideology indicates Lawrence's political 'failure'. Chapters One and Two provide extended analyses of, respectively, the novels Women in Love and Kangaroo: the first of these novels sees Lawrentian individuals attempting to 'solve' the problem of an oppressive industrial society by escaping it; the second shows the shortcomings of the 'freedom' won by such a supposed escape. Examining the contradictions of Lawrence's individualism, I argue the case that these texts present a rich commentary upon the economic and social contradictions of capitalism. My third chapter takes a broader view of Lawrence's shorter, ironical and satirical works, and argues that an openly satirical mode allowed Lawrence to break free from his contradictory 'philosophy' and engage in a critical dialogue with his own work that is much more penetrating than any critique by his Lawrentian admirers. Finally, the conclusion looks at the persisting problem of the 'Lawrentian' attitude in Lawrence studies, and at the enduring significance of Lawrence to our postmodem world.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:27:54Z
format Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-11962
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:27:54Z
publishDate 2002
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-119622025-02-28T11:16:45Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/11962/ D.H. Lawrence: Lawrentian politics and ideology Skelton, Philip This thesis aims to provide a critical re-evaluation of politics and ideology in the work of D.H. Lawrence. The thesis brings a number of authors (including the Marquis de Sade, Robert Louis Stevenson, H. G. Wells and Raymond Chandler) into dialogue with Lawrence - fIrstly in order to interrogate Lawrentian assumptions, but also to relocate a writer often seen as being eccentric to literary circles and to society generally. My Introduction surveys two broad schools of Lawrence criticism: first, the 'Lawrentian' kind, which inspects Lawrence's fiction through an often uncritical appreciation of the non-fictional writings - his 'philosophy' - and consequently is often reduced to an echo of the primary material. While recognising, in the manner of my second, socialist school of criticism, Lawrence's philosophy as ideology, a challenge is also made to the conventional left-wing judgement that such ideology indicates Lawrence's political 'failure'. Chapters One and Two provide extended analyses of, respectively, the novels Women in Love and Kangaroo: the first of these novels sees Lawrentian individuals attempting to 'solve' the problem of an oppressive industrial society by escaping it; the second shows the shortcomings of the 'freedom' won by such a supposed escape. Examining the contradictions of Lawrence's individualism, I argue the case that these texts present a rich commentary upon the economic and social contradictions of capitalism. My third chapter takes a broader view of Lawrence's shorter, ironical and satirical works, and argues that an openly satirical mode allowed Lawrence to break free from his contradictory 'philosophy' and engage in a critical dialogue with his own work that is much more penetrating than any critique by his Lawrentian admirers. Finally, the conclusion looks at the persisting problem of the 'Lawrentian' attitude in Lawrence studies, and at the enduring significance of Lawrence to our postmodem world. 2002 Thesis (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en arr https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/11962/1/289310.pdf Skelton, Philip (2002) D.H. Lawrence: Lawrentian politics and ideology. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. Individualism literature mass media performing arts political science public administration philosophy religion
spellingShingle Individualism
literature
mass media
performing arts
political science
public administration
philosophy
religion
Skelton, Philip
D.H. Lawrence: Lawrentian politics and ideology
title D.H. Lawrence: Lawrentian politics and ideology
title_full D.H. Lawrence: Lawrentian politics and ideology
title_fullStr D.H. Lawrence: Lawrentian politics and ideology
title_full_unstemmed D.H. Lawrence: Lawrentian politics and ideology
title_short D.H. Lawrence: Lawrentian politics and ideology
title_sort d.h. lawrence: lawrentian politics and ideology
topic Individualism
literature
mass media
performing arts
political science
public administration
philosophy
religion
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/11962/