The development & implementation of housing action trust policy

This thesis examines the development and implementation of Housing Action Trust (HAT) policy, with a particular emphasis on the theme of choice. When first announced, the Secretary of State for the Environment, Nick Ridley, argued that HATs would form the ‘cutting edge’ of the Government's urba...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tiesdell, Steven
Format: Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 1999
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/11224/
_version_ 1848791223813275648
author Tiesdell, Steven
author_facet Tiesdell, Steven
author_sort Tiesdell, Steven
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description This thesis examines the development and implementation of Housing Action Trust (HAT) policy, with a particular emphasis on the theme of choice. When first announced, the Secretary of State for the Environment, Nick Ridley, argued that HATs would form the ‘cutting edge’ of the Government's urban regenerationin itiatives. In practice, as only six HATs were ever established, they became something much more marginal and experimental. HAT policy therefore represents a curious episode in the development of housing policy in England. The 1980s Conservative Government's political ideology had been particularly influenced by the New Right and their critique of the welfare state, which inter alia called for the removal of the local authority monopoly in the rented housing sector through the demunicipalisation of local authority housing. The first policy instrument to demunicipalise council housing was a statutory right-to-buy (RTB) for council tenants introduced in 1980. During the late 1980s, three further exit mechanisms were introduced: Tenants' Choice, HATs and voluntary transfers. Proposals for HATs were met with fierce opposition from the Labour party, local authorities and tenants. None of the first six areas intended to be designated as HATs were implemented. In March 1991, however, the first successful HAT ballot occurred in Hull, followed by a second in the London Borough of Waltham Forest in July 1991 and a third in Liverpool in August, 1992. In total six HATs were established. Chapter Two outlines the research agenda. Chapter Three discusses the major developments in housing policy during the 1980s. Building on Chapters One and Three, Chapter Four focuses specifically on HAT policy. Chapters Five to Seven examine HAT practice, with each Chapter focusing on one of the first three HATs. Chapter Eight draws conclusions.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:25:06Z
format Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-11224
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:25:06Z
publishDate 1999
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-112242025-02-28T11:12:04Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/11224/ The development & implementation of housing action trust policy Tiesdell, Steven This thesis examines the development and implementation of Housing Action Trust (HAT) policy, with a particular emphasis on the theme of choice. When first announced, the Secretary of State for the Environment, Nick Ridley, argued that HATs would form the ‘cutting edge’ of the Government's urban regenerationin itiatives. In practice, as only six HATs were ever established, they became something much more marginal and experimental. HAT policy therefore represents a curious episode in the development of housing policy in England. The 1980s Conservative Government's political ideology had been particularly influenced by the New Right and their critique of the welfare state, which inter alia called for the removal of the local authority monopoly in the rented housing sector through the demunicipalisation of local authority housing. The first policy instrument to demunicipalise council housing was a statutory right-to-buy (RTB) for council tenants introduced in 1980. During the late 1980s, three further exit mechanisms were introduced: Tenants' Choice, HATs and voluntary transfers. Proposals for HATs were met with fierce opposition from the Labour party, local authorities and tenants. None of the first six areas intended to be designated as HATs were implemented. In March 1991, however, the first successful HAT ballot occurred in Hull, followed by a second in the London Borough of Waltham Forest in July 1991 and a third in Liverpool in August, 1992. In total six HATs were established. Chapter Two outlines the research agenda. Chapter Three discusses the major developments in housing policy during the 1980s. Building on Chapters One and Three, Chapter Four focuses specifically on HAT policy. Chapters Five to Seven examine HAT practice, with each Chapter focusing on one of the first three HATs. Chapter Eight draws conclusions. 1999-12-17 Thesis (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en arr https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/11224/1/311662.pdf Tiesdell, Steven (1999) The development & implementation of housing action trust policy. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. housing housing policy housing action trusts uk britain
spellingShingle housing
housing policy
housing action trusts
uk
britain
Tiesdell, Steven
The development & implementation of housing action trust policy
title The development & implementation of housing action trust policy
title_full The development & implementation of housing action trust policy
title_fullStr The development & implementation of housing action trust policy
title_full_unstemmed The development & implementation of housing action trust policy
title_short The development & implementation of housing action trust policy
title_sort development & implementation of housing action trust policy
topic housing
housing policy
housing action trusts
uk
britain
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/11224/