Social worker's attitudes to poverty and the poor

Field social workers are in daily working contact with the poor and deprived. In Britain as many as nine out of ten users of social work services are claimants of social security; over half are dependent on means tested social assistance. Most referrals to social workers are for benefit and housing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Becker, Saul
Format: Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 1987
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/11223/
_version_ 1848791223585734656
author Becker, Saul
author_facet Becker, Saul
author_sort Becker, Saul
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Field social workers are in daily working contact with the poor and deprived. In Britain as many as nine out of ten users of social work services are claimants of social security; over half are dependent on means tested social assistance. Most referrals to social workers are for benefit and housing problems. Social work trainers, managers, and agencies expect social workers to have positive attitudes to clients. Professional training is increasingly confronting racist and sexist attitudes amongst student social workers; but very little is known about social workers' attitudes to poor people or how these attitudes affect the nature and delivery of social work services to claimants - the main user group of social services. This study explores the attitudes to poverty of over 450 field social workers. As a group these social workers have relatively "positive" attitudes to the poor and feel very strongly - in a supportive direction - about a number of issues confronting social security claimants. Poverty itself is defined in relative terms, as a lack of opportunities for choice and participation in customs and practices accepted by the non poor population. The poor are viewed very much as victims of injustice and structural inequalities. But most social workers employ individualising methods of work aimed at helping clients adapt to their financial status and circumstances. Less individually focused approaches are generally unpopular. Organisational structures, priorities, and dominant methods of working are powerful constraints on alternative approaches. Current methods reinforce definitions of acceptable practice. The study raises important issues for the operation, practice, management and organisation of social work; in addition there are a number of implications for the research of attitudes to poverty. Social workers' attitudes to poverty and the poor are characterised by contradiction and paradox, as is social work itself. The study of these attitudes requires a number of complementary research methodologies.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:25:06Z
format Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-11223
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:25:06Z
publishDate 1987
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-112232025-02-28T11:12:04Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/11223/ Social worker's attitudes to poverty and the poor Becker, Saul Field social workers are in daily working contact with the poor and deprived. In Britain as many as nine out of ten users of social work services are claimants of social security; over half are dependent on means tested social assistance. Most referrals to social workers are for benefit and housing problems. Social work trainers, managers, and agencies expect social workers to have positive attitudes to clients. Professional training is increasingly confronting racist and sexist attitudes amongst student social workers; but very little is known about social workers' attitudes to poor people or how these attitudes affect the nature and delivery of social work services to claimants - the main user group of social services. This study explores the attitudes to poverty of over 450 field social workers. As a group these social workers have relatively "positive" attitudes to the poor and feel very strongly - in a supportive direction - about a number of issues confronting social security claimants. Poverty itself is defined in relative terms, as a lack of opportunities for choice and participation in customs and practices accepted by the non poor population. The poor are viewed very much as victims of injustice and structural inequalities. But most social workers employ individualising methods of work aimed at helping clients adapt to their financial status and circumstances. Less individually focused approaches are generally unpopular. Organisational structures, priorities, and dominant methods of working are powerful constraints on alternative approaches. Current methods reinforce definitions of acceptable practice. The study raises important issues for the operation, practice, management and organisation of social work; in addition there are a number of implications for the research of attitudes to poverty. Social workers' attitudes to poverty and the poor are characterised by contradiction and paradox, as is social work itself. The study of these attitudes requires a number of complementary research methodologies. 1987 Thesis (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en arr https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/11223/1/378269.pdf Becker, Saul (1987) Social worker's attitudes to poverty and the poor. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. Social worker attitude Sociology Human services Labor
spellingShingle Social worker attitude
Sociology
Human services
Labor
Becker, Saul
Social worker's attitudes to poverty and the poor
title Social worker's attitudes to poverty and the poor
title_full Social worker's attitudes to poverty and the poor
title_fullStr Social worker's attitudes to poverty and the poor
title_full_unstemmed Social worker's attitudes to poverty and the poor
title_short Social worker's attitudes to poverty and the poor
title_sort social worker's attitudes to poverty and the poor
topic Social worker attitude
Sociology
Human services
Labor
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/11223/