The articulation of identity in discourses of surveillance in the United Kingdom

This thesis enacts a discursive approach to surveillance in the UK, revealing implications for surveillance theory, governmentality theory, and for political and social identity theories. It demonstrates the importance of a discursive approach to surveillance, as an expansion of assemblage models of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Barnard-Wills, David
Format: Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/10850/
_version_ 1848791141811486720
author Barnard-Wills, David
author_facet Barnard-Wills, David
author_sort Barnard-Wills, David
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description This thesis enacts a discursive approach to surveillance in the UK, revealing implications for surveillance theory, governmentality theory, and for political and social identity theories. It demonstrates the importance of a discursive approach to surveillance, as an expansion of assemblage models of surveillance. It finds convergence between government, governance, finance and media discourses, sufficient to conceive of these as forming a shared governmental discourse of surveillance. Governmental, financial and media discourses tend to privilege the assumption that surveillance systems are effective and accurate. This ideological function elides the contingent nature of surveillant practices, presenting them as non-political technological functions. Governmentality accounts of surveillance are supplemented by an expanded understanding of identity as a contested concept, or floating signifier, articulated in particular ways in governmental discourses. The discourse theory informed analysis in this thesis points to a distinct articulation of identity – the governmental surveillant identity – a political attempt to fix the meaning of identity, and construct a surveillance-permeable form that draws upon the privileging of technological truth over human truth. Identity is articulated across many of the five discourses studied as socially vulnerable. The core articulation of the problem of governance is that identity is problematised; unreliable for the proper functioning of governance in society. Because identity is vulnerable and because identity’s ontological nature makes it possible, identity must be checked and secured.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:23:48Z
format Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-10850
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:23:48Z
publishDate 2009
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-108502025-02-28T11:09:58Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/10850/ The articulation of identity in discourses of surveillance in the United Kingdom Barnard-Wills, David This thesis enacts a discursive approach to surveillance in the UK, revealing implications for surveillance theory, governmentality theory, and for political and social identity theories. It demonstrates the importance of a discursive approach to surveillance, as an expansion of assemblage models of surveillance. It finds convergence between government, governance, finance and media discourses, sufficient to conceive of these as forming a shared governmental discourse of surveillance. Governmental, financial and media discourses tend to privilege the assumption that surveillance systems are effective and accurate. This ideological function elides the contingent nature of surveillant practices, presenting them as non-political technological functions. Governmentality accounts of surveillance are supplemented by an expanded understanding of identity as a contested concept, or floating signifier, articulated in particular ways in governmental discourses. The discourse theory informed analysis in this thesis points to a distinct articulation of identity – the governmental surveillant identity – a political attempt to fix the meaning of identity, and construct a surveillance-permeable form that draws upon the privileging of technological truth over human truth. Identity is articulated across many of the five discourses studied as socially vulnerable. The core articulation of the problem of governance is that identity is problematised; unreliable for the proper functioning of governance in society. Because identity is vulnerable and because identity’s ontological nature makes it possible, identity must be checked and secured. 2009-03-15 Thesis (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en arr https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/10850/1/Identity_in_discourses_of_surveillance.pdf Barnard-Wills, David (2009) The articulation of identity in discourses of surveillance in the United Kingdom. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. surveillance discourse analysis politics identity text
spellingShingle surveillance
discourse analysis
politics
identity
text
Barnard-Wills, David
The articulation of identity in discourses of surveillance in the United Kingdom
title The articulation of identity in discourses of surveillance in the United Kingdom
title_full The articulation of identity in discourses of surveillance in the United Kingdom
title_fullStr The articulation of identity in discourses of surveillance in the United Kingdom
title_full_unstemmed The articulation of identity in discourses of surveillance in the United Kingdom
title_short The articulation of identity in discourses of surveillance in the United Kingdom
title_sort articulation of identity in discourses of surveillance in the united kingdom
topic surveillance
discourse analysis
politics
identity
text
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/10850/