An evaluation of soft law as a method for regulating public procurement from a trade perspective

This research is to evaluate soft law as a method to regulate public procurement from a trade perspective. The value of soft law is studied under this thesis according to a four-fold approach – bindingness, precision, discretion and delegation. An international legal instrument can be considered sof...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jiang, Lili
Format: Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/10700/
_version_ 1848791118323384320
author Jiang, Lili
author_facet Jiang, Lili
author_sort Jiang, Lili
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description This research is to evaluate soft law as a method to regulate public procurement from a trade perspective. The value of soft law is studied under this thesis according to a four-fold approach – bindingness, precision, discretion and delegation. An international legal instrument can be considered soft along one or more of the above four dimensions. Based on the reviews of the current procurement regimes, the thesis outlines the values of soft law in regulating procurement. Soft law may serve as a second-best to hard law where the latter can not be achieved. It is explained that public procurement is a sensitive subject in the sense that many states are often unwilling to give up their regulatory freedom for protectionism purposes. Soft law in terms of all the four dimensions is argued as an effective device for breaking deadlock and fostering compromises in negotiating a procurement agreement. Also, it can serve as an ‘intermediate step’ towards the formation of hard law even though this is not necessarily the case. Soft law can also be regarded as a better alternative to hard law even where the latter is attainable. Possible advantages of soft law are identified including its reduced negotiating costs; reduced implementing costs; reserved states’ regulatory autonomy for national legitimate objectives and better adaptation to changes. Meanwhile, its possible disadvantages are mentioned and possible ways of addressing these disadvantages are also suggested. Special features of procurement are identified including intrusiveness, sensitivity, complexity and constant evolution, which might be relevant for soft law’s influence in that particular area. At the end, the thesis sets out both s short-term and a long-term proposal for developing a multilateral agreement on government by use of soft law.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:23:25Z
format Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-10700
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:23:25Z
publishDate 2009
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-107002025-02-28T11:09:16Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/10700/ An evaluation of soft law as a method for regulating public procurement from a trade perspective Jiang, Lili This research is to evaluate soft law as a method to regulate public procurement from a trade perspective. The value of soft law is studied under this thesis according to a four-fold approach – bindingness, precision, discretion and delegation. An international legal instrument can be considered soft along one or more of the above four dimensions. Based on the reviews of the current procurement regimes, the thesis outlines the values of soft law in regulating procurement. Soft law may serve as a second-best to hard law where the latter can not be achieved. It is explained that public procurement is a sensitive subject in the sense that many states are often unwilling to give up their regulatory freedom for protectionism purposes. Soft law in terms of all the four dimensions is argued as an effective device for breaking deadlock and fostering compromises in negotiating a procurement agreement. Also, it can serve as an ‘intermediate step’ towards the formation of hard law even though this is not necessarily the case. Soft law can also be regarded as a better alternative to hard law even where the latter is attainable. Possible advantages of soft law are identified including its reduced negotiating costs; reduced implementing costs; reserved states’ regulatory autonomy for national legitimate objectives and better adaptation to changes. Meanwhile, its possible disadvantages are mentioned and possible ways of addressing these disadvantages are also suggested. Special features of procurement are identified including intrusiveness, sensitivity, complexity and constant evolution, which might be relevant for soft law’s influence in that particular area. At the end, the thesis sets out both s short-term and a long-term proposal for developing a multilateral agreement on government by use of soft law. 2009-07-15 Thesis (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en arr https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/10700/1/Thesis_Final.pdf Jiang, Lili (2009) An evaluation of soft law as a method for regulating public procurement from a trade perspective. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. procurement government purchasing law soft law
spellingShingle procurement
government purchasing
law
soft law
Jiang, Lili
An evaluation of soft law as a method for regulating public procurement from a trade perspective
title An evaluation of soft law as a method for regulating public procurement from a trade perspective
title_full An evaluation of soft law as a method for regulating public procurement from a trade perspective
title_fullStr An evaluation of soft law as a method for regulating public procurement from a trade perspective
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of soft law as a method for regulating public procurement from a trade perspective
title_short An evaluation of soft law as a method for regulating public procurement from a trade perspective
title_sort evaluation of soft law as a method for regulating public procurement from a trade perspective
topic procurement
government purchasing
law
soft law
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/10700/