Saliency and eye movements in the perception of natural scenes

Humans inspect the environment around them by selecting a sequence of locations to fixate which will provide information about the scene. How are these locations chosen? The saliency map model suggests that points in the scene are represented topographically and that the likelihood of them being f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Foulsham, Thomas
Format: Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/10553/
_version_ 1848791097686360064
author Foulsham, Thomas
author_facet Foulsham, Thomas
author_sort Foulsham, Thomas
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Humans inspect the environment around them by selecting a sequence of locations to fixate which will provide information about the scene. How are these locations chosen? The saliency map model suggests that points in the scene are represented topographically and that the likelihood of them being fixated depends on low-level feature contrast. This model makes specific predictions about the way people will move their eyes when looking at natural scenes, although there are few experimental tests of these predictions. The experiments described in this thesis show effects of visual saliency on the likelihood and the speed at which objects are fixated. Experiment 1 shows that the potency of salient objects is moderated by the task being performed. When the task does not constrain the regions of interest, as in a general encoding situation, the saliency model performs better than chance estimates (Experiments 2 and 3). There are also sequential patterns of eye movements in this task - scanpaths - that the model does not reproduce. In visual search, participants can saccade to a target object, and this is quicker, in some cases, if the target is more salient (Experiments 4-7). A salient distractor impedes search more than a non-salient one (Experiments 8 and 9). The context of the scene also has an effect on search, and features of the layout, in particular the horizon, may cause an asymmetry in saccade direction (Experiment 10). Findings from research with a visual agnosia patient are consistent with the idea that scene understanding and saliency combine in guiding the eyes (Experiment 11). These experiments support a framework that incorporates a task-driven prior, gist and the relevance of each region to the task, in addition to bottom-up saliency. Thus saliency is just one part of the way in which people move their eyes.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:23:06Z
format Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-10553
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:23:06Z
publishDate 2008
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-105532025-02-28T11:08:46Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/10553/ Saliency and eye movements in the perception of natural scenes Foulsham, Thomas Humans inspect the environment around them by selecting a sequence of locations to fixate which will provide information about the scene. How are these locations chosen? The saliency map model suggests that points in the scene are represented topographically and that the likelihood of them being fixated depends on low-level feature contrast. This model makes specific predictions about the way people will move their eyes when looking at natural scenes, although there are few experimental tests of these predictions. The experiments described in this thesis show effects of visual saliency on the likelihood and the speed at which objects are fixated. Experiment 1 shows that the potency of salient objects is moderated by the task being performed. When the task does not constrain the regions of interest, as in a general encoding situation, the saliency model performs better than chance estimates (Experiments 2 and 3). There are also sequential patterns of eye movements in this task - scanpaths - that the model does not reproduce. In visual search, participants can saccade to a target object, and this is quicker, in some cases, if the target is more salient (Experiments 4-7). A salient distractor impedes search more than a non-salient one (Experiments 8 and 9). The context of the scene also has an effect on search, and features of the layout, in particular the horizon, may cause an asymmetry in saccade direction (Experiment 10). Findings from research with a visual agnosia patient are consistent with the idea that scene understanding and saliency combine in guiding the eyes (Experiment 11). These experiments support a framework that incorporates a task-driven prior, gist and the relevance of each region to the task, in addition to bottom-up saliency. Thus saliency is just one part of the way in which people move their eyes. 2008 Thesis (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en arr https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/10553/1/TF_final.pdf Foulsham, Thomas (2008) Saliency and eye movements in the perception of natural scenes. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. eye movements saccades visual search saliency scene perception
spellingShingle eye movements
saccades
visual search
saliency
scene perception
Foulsham, Thomas
Saliency and eye movements in the perception of natural scenes
title Saliency and eye movements in the perception of natural scenes
title_full Saliency and eye movements in the perception of natural scenes
title_fullStr Saliency and eye movements in the perception of natural scenes
title_full_unstemmed Saliency and eye movements in the perception of natural scenes
title_short Saliency and eye movements in the perception of natural scenes
title_sort saliency and eye movements in the perception of natural scenes
topic eye movements
saccades
visual search
saliency
scene perception
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/10553/