Explaining individual differences in strategy variability amongst secondary school mathematics students

This thesis reports an investigation of individual differences in children's learning of a concept in mathematics, involving rates of change on linear graphs. Evidence in the literature suggests both that high levels of strategy variability are associated with conceptual change in mathematics a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jay, Tim
Format: Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/10424/
_version_ 1848791079060504576
author Jay, Tim
author_facet Jay, Tim
author_sort Jay, Tim
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description This thesis reports an investigation of individual differences in children's learning of a concept in mathematics, involving rates of change on linear graphs. Evidence in the literature suggests both that high levels of strategy variability are associated with conceptual change in mathematics and that there are individual differences in strategy variability. Therefore it is argued that differences in strategy variability can offer useful insight into children's learning of mathematics. A series of experiments are reported that each aimed to explore individual and group differences in strategy variability amongst secondary school mathematics students. Methods used for data collection progressed from whole-class testing of students, to individual testing, to individual interviews employing think-aloud protocols, as the need grew for increasingly detailed data on children's strategies for solving problems. Early studies showed a gender difference in strategy variability, so later studies were designed to elaborate on and clarify this relationship. In combination, the results of the studies reported here suggest that there are robust differences in strategy variability between boys and girls and that this effect interacts with the context in which the problems are solved. The use of think-aloud protocols produced a complete reversal of the gender effect on strategy variability. The implications of these findings are discussed, both in terms of learning theory and in terms of their potential impact on the mathematics classroom. The main contribution of this investigation to the literature is in helping to establish strategy variability as a key to understanding cognitive development and as an indicator of children's specific needs for intervention and support in the classroom.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:22:48Z
format Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-10424
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:22:48Z
publishDate 2007
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-104242025-02-28T11:08:15Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/10424/ Explaining individual differences in strategy variability amongst secondary school mathematics students Jay, Tim This thesis reports an investigation of individual differences in children's learning of a concept in mathematics, involving rates of change on linear graphs. Evidence in the literature suggests both that high levels of strategy variability are associated with conceptual change in mathematics and that there are individual differences in strategy variability. Therefore it is argued that differences in strategy variability can offer useful insight into children's learning of mathematics. A series of experiments are reported that each aimed to explore individual and group differences in strategy variability amongst secondary school mathematics students. Methods used for data collection progressed from whole-class testing of students, to individual testing, to individual interviews employing think-aloud protocols, as the need grew for increasingly detailed data on children's strategies for solving problems. Early studies showed a gender difference in strategy variability, so later studies were designed to elaborate on and clarify this relationship. In combination, the results of the studies reported here suggest that there are robust differences in strategy variability between boys and girls and that this effect interacts with the context in which the problems are solved. The use of think-aloud protocols produced a complete reversal of the gender effect on strategy variability. The implications of these findings are discussed, both in terms of learning theory and in terms of their potential impact on the mathematics classroom. The main contribution of this investigation to the literature is in helping to establish strategy variability as a key to understanding cognitive development and as an indicator of children's specific needs for intervention and support in the classroom. 2007 Thesis (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en arr https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/10424/1/Thesis_-_final_version_-_print_ready.pdf Jay, Tim (2007) Explaining individual differences in strategy variability amongst secondary school mathematics students. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. cognition mathematics problem solving individual differences verbal protocols gender
spellingShingle cognition
mathematics
problem solving
individual differences
verbal protocols
gender
Jay, Tim
Explaining individual differences in strategy variability amongst secondary school mathematics students
title Explaining individual differences in strategy variability amongst secondary school mathematics students
title_full Explaining individual differences in strategy variability amongst secondary school mathematics students
title_fullStr Explaining individual differences in strategy variability amongst secondary school mathematics students
title_full_unstemmed Explaining individual differences in strategy variability amongst secondary school mathematics students
title_short Explaining individual differences in strategy variability amongst secondary school mathematics students
title_sort explaining individual differences in strategy variability amongst secondary school mathematics students
topic cognition
mathematics
problem solving
individual differences
verbal protocols
gender
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/10424/