Comparison of Utility-First CSS Framework
Utility-first CSS frameworks have revolutionized web development by offering predefined utility classes that streamline the design process and reduce the need for custom CSS. However, selecting the right framework can be challenging due to the variety of available options. This paper addresses th...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English English |
| Published: |
INTI International University
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/2069/ http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/2069/2/610 http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/2069/3/joit2024_32b.pdf |
| _version_ | 1848766911633948672 |
|---|---|
| author | Nandan, S. Usha, Sree R. Priyanka, Mohan |
| author_facet | Nandan, S. Usha, Sree R. Priyanka, Mohan |
| author_sort | Nandan, S. |
| building | INTI Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Utility-first CSS frameworks have revolutionized web development by offering predefined utility
classes that streamline the design process and reduce the need for custom CSS. However, selecting
the right framework can be challenging due to the variety of available options. This paper addresses
the problem of choosing between two of the leading utility-first CSS frameworks Tailwind CSS
and Tachyons by providing a comparative analysis based on key factors such as size, load speed,
flexibility, ease of use, and community support. The objective of this research is to identify the
strengths and weaknesses of both frameworks, helping developers make informed decisions based
on project needs. Our methodology involved testing load speeds using Locust for performance
analysis, reviewing community support through GitHub repositories and forums, and assessing the
flexibility and ease of use through practical development tasks. The results revealed that while
both frameworks are robust, Tachyons excels in performance and simplicity due to its smaller size,
whereas Tailwind CSS offers greater customization and flexibility, making it more suitable for
complex projects. The novelty of this research lies in its direct comparison of utility-first
frameworks, highlighting how developer preferences and project requirements play a crucial role
in framework selection. In summary, this study provides valuable insights for developers looking
to optimize web development workflows by selecting the most appropriate CSS framework based
on specific project goals. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T11:58:40Z |
| format | Article |
| id | intimal-2069 |
| institution | INTI International University |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T11:58:40Z |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | INTI International University |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | intimal-20692025-07-11T03:15:41Z http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/2069/ Comparison of Utility-First CSS Framework Nandan, S. Usha, Sree R. Priyanka, Mohan QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science QA76 Computer software T Technology (General) TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Utility-first CSS frameworks have revolutionized web development by offering predefined utility classes that streamline the design process and reduce the need for custom CSS. However, selecting the right framework can be challenging due to the variety of available options. This paper addresses the problem of choosing between two of the leading utility-first CSS frameworks Tailwind CSS and Tachyons by providing a comparative analysis based on key factors such as size, load speed, flexibility, ease of use, and community support. The objective of this research is to identify the strengths and weaknesses of both frameworks, helping developers make informed decisions based on project needs. Our methodology involved testing load speeds using Locust for performance analysis, reviewing community support through GitHub repositories and forums, and assessing the flexibility and ease of use through practical development tasks. The results revealed that while both frameworks are robust, Tachyons excels in performance and simplicity due to its smaller size, whereas Tailwind CSS offers greater customization and flexibility, making it more suitable for complex projects. The novelty of this research lies in its direct comparison of utility-first frameworks, highlighting how developer preferences and project requirements play a crucial role in framework selection. In summary, this study provides valuable insights for developers looking to optimize web development workflows by selecting the most appropriate CSS framework based on specific project goals. INTI International University 2024-11 Article PeerReviewed text en cc_by_4 http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/2069/2/610 text en cc_by_4 http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/2069/3/joit2024_32b.pdf Nandan, S. and Usha, Sree R. and Priyanka, Mohan (2024) Comparison of Utility-First CSS Framework. Journal of Innovation and Technology, 2024 (32). pp. 1-6. ISSN 2805-5179 http://ipublishing.intimal.edu.my/joint.html |
| spellingShingle | QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science QA76 Computer software T Technology (General) TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Nandan, S. Usha, Sree R. Priyanka, Mohan Comparison of Utility-First CSS Framework |
| title | Comparison of Utility-First CSS Framework |
| title_full | Comparison of Utility-First CSS Framework |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of Utility-First CSS Framework |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Utility-First CSS Framework |
| title_short | Comparison of Utility-First CSS Framework |
| title_sort | comparison of utility-first css framework |
| topic | QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science QA76 Computer software T Technology (General) TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
| url | http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/2069/ http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/2069/ http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/2069/2/610 http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/2069/3/joit2024_32b.pdf |