Comparison of Measured and Computed Radial Trajectories of Plasma Focus Devices UMDPF1 and UMDPF0

In published literature, there has been scant data on radial trajectory of the plasma focus and no comparison of computed with measured radial trajectory. This paper provides the first such comparative study. We compute the trajectories of the inward-moving radial shock and magnetic piston of UMDPF1...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lim, L. H., Yap, S. L., Lim, L. K., Lee, M. C., Poh, H. S., Ma, J., Yap, S. S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIP Publishing 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/13/
http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/13/1/Comparison%20of%20Measured%20and%20Computed%20Radial%20Trajectories%20of%20Plasma%20Focus%20Devices%20UMDPF1%20and%20UMDPF0.pdf
_version_ 1848766375527448576
author Lim, L. H.
Yap, S. L.
Lim, L. K.
Lee, M. C.
Poh, H. S.
Ma, J.
Yap, S. S.
author_facet Lim, L. H.
Yap, S. L.
Lim, L. K.
Lee, M. C.
Poh, H. S.
Ma, J.
Yap, S. S.
author_sort Lim, L. H.
building INTI Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description In published literature, there has been scant data on radial trajectory of the plasma focus and no comparison of computed with measured radial trajectory. This paper provides the first such comparative study. We compute the trajectories of the inward-moving radial shock and magnetic piston of UMDPF1 plasma focus and compare these with measured data taken from a streak photograph. The comparison shows agreement with the measured radial trajectory in terms of average speeds and general shape of trajectory. This paper also presents the measured trajectory of the radially compressing piston in another machine, the UMDPF0 plasma focus, confirming that the computed radial trajectory also shows similar general agreement. Features of divergence between the computed and measured trajectories, towards the end of the radial compression, are discussed. From the measured radial trajectories, an inference is made that the neutron yield mechanism could not be thermonuclear. A second inference is made regarding the speeds of axial post-pinch shocks, which are recently considered as a useful tool for damage testing of fusion-related wall materials.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:50:09Z
format Article
id intimal-13
institution INTI International University
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:50:09Z
publishDate 2015
publisher AIP Publishing
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling intimal-132016-09-14T03:34:41Z http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/13/ Comparison of Measured and Computed Radial Trajectories of Plasma Focus Devices UMDPF1 and UMDPF0 Lim, L. H. Yap, S. L. Lim, L. K. Lee, M. C. Poh, H. S. Ma, J. Yap, S. S. QC Physics In published literature, there has been scant data on radial trajectory of the plasma focus and no comparison of computed with measured radial trajectory. This paper provides the first such comparative study. We compute the trajectories of the inward-moving radial shock and magnetic piston of UMDPF1 plasma focus and compare these with measured data taken from a streak photograph. The comparison shows agreement with the measured radial trajectory in terms of average speeds and general shape of trajectory. This paper also presents the measured trajectory of the radially compressing piston in another machine, the UMDPF0 plasma focus, confirming that the computed radial trajectory also shows similar general agreement. Features of divergence between the computed and measured trajectories, towards the end of the radial compression, are discussed. From the measured radial trajectories, an inference is made that the neutron yield mechanism could not be thermonuclear. A second inference is made regarding the speeds of axial post-pinch shocks, which are recently considered as a useful tool for damage testing of fusion-related wall materials. AIP Publishing 2015 Article PeerReviewed text en http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/13/1/Comparison%20of%20Measured%20and%20Computed%20Radial%20Trajectories%20of%20Plasma%20Focus%20Devices%20UMDPF1%20and%20UMDPF0.pdf Lim, L. H. and Yap, S. L. and Lim, L. K. and Lee, M. C. and Poh, H. S. and Ma, J. and Yap, S. S. (2015) Comparison of Measured and Computed Radial Trajectories of Plasma Focus Devices UMDPF1 and UMDPF0. Physics of Plasmas, 22 (9). ISSN 1089-7674 10.1063/1.4929856
spellingShingle QC Physics
Lim, L. H.
Yap, S. L.
Lim, L. K.
Lee, M. C.
Poh, H. S.
Ma, J.
Yap, S. S.
Comparison of Measured and Computed Radial Trajectories of Plasma Focus Devices UMDPF1 and UMDPF0
title Comparison of Measured and Computed Radial Trajectories of Plasma Focus Devices UMDPF1 and UMDPF0
title_full Comparison of Measured and Computed Radial Trajectories of Plasma Focus Devices UMDPF1 and UMDPF0
title_fullStr Comparison of Measured and Computed Radial Trajectories of Plasma Focus Devices UMDPF1 and UMDPF0
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Measured and Computed Radial Trajectories of Plasma Focus Devices UMDPF1 and UMDPF0
title_short Comparison of Measured and Computed Radial Trajectories of Plasma Focus Devices UMDPF1 and UMDPF0
title_sort comparison of measured and computed radial trajectories of plasma focus devices umdpf1 and umdpf0
topic QC Physics
url http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/13/
http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/13/
http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/13/1/Comparison%20of%20Measured%20and%20Computed%20Radial%20Trajectories%20of%20Plasma%20Focus%20Devices%20UMDPF1%20and%20UMDPF0.pdf