The emerging issues under Section 106 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976: a need for family mediation in Malaysia

Dispute resolution outside of court is not new; societies world-over have long used non-judicial and indigenous methods to resolve conflicts. Family disputes, more often than not, are rarely concerned with matters of fact but is almost invariably complicated by the intense and intimate emotions of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdul Hak, Nora, Md Hashim, Noraini, Rahmat, Nur Ezan
Format: Proceeding Paper
Language:English
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/9386/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/9386/1/International_Conference_on_Public_Law_2011.pdf
_version_ 1848777120358072320
author Abdul Hak, Nora
Md Hashim, Noraini
Rahmat, Nur Ezan
author_facet Abdul Hak, Nora
Md Hashim, Noraini
Rahmat, Nur Ezan
author_sort Abdul Hak, Nora
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
description Dispute resolution outside of court is not new; societies world-over have long used non-judicial and indigenous methods to resolve conflicts. Family disputes, more often than not, are rarely concerned with matters of fact but is almost invariably complicated by the intense and intimate emotions of the parties in conflict. Therefore, the utilization of other processes, such as conciliation and mediation, independent of litigation will lead to a more satisfactory resolution of disputes rather than relying on the judgments of the court of law. Section 55(2) of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 (the 1976 Act) provides that even when the parties have presented a petition for divorce, if it appears to the court at any stage of the proceedings that there is a reasonable possibility of a reconciliation between them, the court may adjourn the proceedings for such period as it thinks fit to enable attempts to be made to affect such a reconciliation. In the case of a petition for divorce based on the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage, the petitioner must first refer the matrimonial difficulty to a conciliatory body before filing the petition. No person shall petition for divorce, except under sections 51 and 52 of the 1976 Act, unless he or she has first referred the matrimonial difficulty to a conciliatory body and that body has certified that it has failed to reconcile the parties. Practitioners of family law are of the view that the conciliation process in Malaysia has not been very successful in helping disputing couples resolving their problems and this is supported by statistics which shows that the success rate for these reconciliation sessions is very low. This paper will highlight on some emerging issues related to the effectiveness of conciliatory bodies appointed under section 106 of the 1976 Act especially the marriage tribunal under the National Registration Department. It will highlight the problems and constraints faced by the conciliatory bodies and will suggest amendments to the laws and policy.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T14:40:56Z
format Proceeding Paper
id iium-9386
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T14:40:56Z
publishDate 2011
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling iium-93862024-12-17T02:54:32Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/9386/ The emerging issues under Section 106 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976: a need for family mediation in Malaysia Abdul Hak, Nora Md Hashim, Noraini Rahmat, Nur Ezan K Law (General) KPG Malaysia Dispute resolution outside of court is not new; societies world-over have long used non-judicial and indigenous methods to resolve conflicts. Family disputes, more often than not, are rarely concerned with matters of fact but is almost invariably complicated by the intense and intimate emotions of the parties in conflict. Therefore, the utilization of other processes, such as conciliation and mediation, independent of litigation will lead to a more satisfactory resolution of disputes rather than relying on the judgments of the court of law. Section 55(2) of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 (the 1976 Act) provides that even when the parties have presented a petition for divorce, if it appears to the court at any stage of the proceedings that there is a reasonable possibility of a reconciliation between them, the court may adjourn the proceedings for such period as it thinks fit to enable attempts to be made to affect such a reconciliation. In the case of a petition for divorce based on the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage, the petitioner must first refer the matrimonial difficulty to a conciliatory body before filing the petition. No person shall petition for divorce, except under sections 51 and 52 of the 1976 Act, unless he or she has first referred the matrimonial difficulty to a conciliatory body and that body has certified that it has failed to reconcile the parties. Practitioners of family law are of the view that the conciliation process in Malaysia has not been very successful in helping disputing couples resolving their problems and this is supported by statistics which shows that the success rate for these reconciliation sessions is very low. This paper will highlight on some emerging issues related to the effectiveness of conciliatory bodies appointed under section 106 of the 1976 Act especially the marriage tribunal under the National Registration Department. It will highlight the problems and constraints faced by the conciliatory bodies and will suggest amendments to the laws and policy. 2011-12-13 Proceeding Paper NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/9386/1/International_Conference_on_Public_Law_2011.pdf Abdul Hak, Nora and Md Hashim, Noraini and Rahmat, Nur Ezan (2011) The emerging issues under Section 106 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976: a need for family mediation in Malaysia. In: International Conference on "Emerging Issues in Public Law: Challenges and Perspectives" 2011 , 13th - 14th December 2011, The Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM). http://law.uitm.edu.my/ICPL2011/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=51&Itemid=62
spellingShingle K Law (General)
KPG Malaysia
Abdul Hak, Nora
Md Hashim, Noraini
Rahmat, Nur Ezan
The emerging issues under Section 106 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976: a need for family mediation in Malaysia
title The emerging issues under Section 106 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976: a need for family mediation in Malaysia
title_full The emerging issues under Section 106 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976: a need for family mediation in Malaysia
title_fullStr The emerging issues under Section 106 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976: a need for family mediation in Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed The emerging issues under Section 106 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976: a need for family mediation in Malaysia
title_short The emerging issues under Section 106 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976: a need for family mediation in Malaysia
title_sort emerging issues under section 106 of the law reform (marriage and divorce) act 1976: a need for family mediation in malaysia
topic K Law (General)
KPG Malaysia
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/9386/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/9386/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/9386/1/International_Conference_on_Public_Law_2011.pdf